Browse
Search
NS ORD-2002-033 Telecommunications Tower Ordinance Amendments
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2002
>
NS ORD-2002-033 Telecommunications Tower Ordinance Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2017 12:24:36 PM
Creation date
4/26/2012 10:39:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/2/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
9a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20021202
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
sip-44 2002 02:17PM <br />FROM- PENNINGTON AND LOTT <br />i <br />+18039291075 T -379 P.008/008 F -403 <br />78 <br />4. VISUALLY INTRUSIVE REQUIREMENTS. Section 6.18.4.b. Page 9. <br />This is ' an additional requirement. This new standard dictates that <br />towers be located in heavily treed areas to the extent possible. This is <br />fine as long as the search area contains a wooded tract with a willing <br />property owner that has access to a public right of way. There will be <br />locations in certain settings where there will be no surrounding <br />wooded vegetation to provide a natural cover. This is a given. Some <br />of these areas will be industrial or commercial settings where it makes <br />sense to have a communications tower. Be aware of this fact. Not all <br />towers can be hidden in the trees. <br />The second sentence of this section* is most troubling. This sentence, <br />regardless of vegetation, requires the applicant to prove that the <br />proposed communications tower will not be visually intrusive to <br />surrounding properties in the area. This Is an Impossible standard. <br />This is such a subjective standard that there. Is no way an applicant <br />can ever be successful in a hearing to the extent there is opposition. <br />First, what Is the definition of "visually intrusive"? If this means that <br />the communications tower is not visible, then the Ordinance is on its <br />face in violation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Verizon <br />Wireless cannot provide effective wireless coverage and capacity with <br />communications towers that are not visible from adjacent and <br />surrounding properties. This is a physical Impossibility, and the <br />Ordinance will. have the effect of prohibiting the provision of wireless <br />communications services in violation of federal law. <br />The better way to approach this Issue is to require objective standards <br />which can be evaluated and met. - Verizon Wireless cannot build <br />invisible communications towers, but it can use good sound judgment <br />In the selection of a site and the placement of the communications <br />tower on the site such that it is least visible and has the least visual <br />Impact on surrounding properties. Such objective standards include <br />the following types of things: <br />a. Limiting the height of the proposed communications <br />tower. <br />b. Limiting the type of communications tower that can be <br />used. <br />C. Regulating the distance and separation requirements of <br />the communications tower from an adjacent property line <br />or from a residential use. <br />d. Regulating the distance and separation requirement of the <br />communications tower from a public right of way. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.