Browse
Search
NS ORD-2002-033 Telecommunications Tower Ordinance Amendments
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2002
>
NS ORD-2002-033 Telecommunications Tower Ordinance Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2017 12:24:36 PM
Creation date
4/26/2012 10:39:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/2/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
9a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20021202
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Q,4 ;? -a-;5 * <br />a. Telecommunications Tower Ordinance Amendments 2� ' d 'z-- <br />The Board considered closing the public hearing and considered amendments to the CL, <br />County's telecommunications tower ordinance. <br />Craig Benedict said that there have been many discussions with staff, consultants, and the <br />industry about how to update this ordinance. This is an overhaul to the existing ordinance. Some of the <br />height requirements have been changed. The Board of County Commissioners will see applications for <br />towers that are under 200 feet if the industry is not providing at least four users on the tower. Each year, <br />there will be an annual telecommunication projection meeting to find out where the industry wants to put <br />towers throughout the year. They are promoting co- location on existing electrical transmission lines. <br />The technical standards for review are higher. The ordinance is requiring periodic inspections and <br />engineering certification of new towers that are put in the County. There is a placeholder in the <br />ordinance for a Master Telecommunication Plan. It is not part of the ordinance tonight. There is also a <br />visual impact analysis. The fee schedule has been greatly revised. There is an escrow agreement <br />where fees will go in escrow for a consultant hired by the County in reviewing the applications. There <br />were some things added by the Planning Board (minimal light diffusion, fall zone, inspections). The <br />Planning Board approved the amendments with a 5 -4 vote. The Planning Board was concerned about <br />how the Master Telecommunication Plan would play into this. <br />The administration recommendation is to approve the amendments with one change. On <br />page five, recommendation number eight, the Planning Board asked that the industry just has to provide <br />the standards in place at the time the tower was originally installed for something that is less than six <br />years old. Administration's recommendation is that we stay with having the industry provide what the <br />current regulations are as far as the structural integrity of the tower. The administration recommends <br />approval of the amendments and of the fee schedule, which will be effective upon approval. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that she has a lot of questions. She would like to hear the public <br />speak and then put this on a consent agenda at a later time. She can get answers from the staff before <br />the next meeting. <br />Public Comment <br />Gary Pennington from Verizon Wireless spoke and encouraged the Board to pass the <br />amendments. He said that this ordinance has been debated at length. His only objection is the fee <br />structure. <br />The decision on this item was deferred to December 10, 2002. <br />b. Eno Ridge Subdivision (Formerly James Woods) Preliminary Plan <br />The Board considered a preliminary plan for the proposed Eno Ridge subdivision. <br />This project is located in Cheeks Township on the west side of Frazier Road between West <br />Lebanon Road and US 70. There are 32 lots with an average lot size of .975 acres. <br />Craig Benedict said that this project was originally known as the James Woods subdivision. <br />The applicant has worked with staff to amend the plan from its conventional design to add more open <br />space (31 %). The original plan only had 10% open space. The open space will be maintained by the <br />homeowners association. There is only one access point from Frazier Road at this time. The developer <br />has agreed to put in a center left turn lane into the project. The project will be serviced by individual well <br />and septic systems. Administration recommends approval of the subdivision as amended. <br />Commissioner Gordon verified that all of the neighbors were notified. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked about number six on page four and the possibility of extending <br />public water services from Orange /Alamance. He asked if there has been any change. Craig Benedict <br />said that Orange /Alamance services some customers in this general area, but not a compact network of <br />users. Orange /Alamance has not developed a master plan to determine the ultimate boundaries. This <br />is outside of Orange County's transition area. There is a trend towards a lot of units in this area. If this <br />pattern continues, then urban services may be necessary in this area. <br />Geoff Gledhill said that the Orange /Alamance connection was part of the conventional plan <br />and is not part of this resolution of approval. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that he was just asking about it because it had been discussed <br />before. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.