Browse
Search
Minutes - 20031015
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Minutes - 20031015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 3:55:21 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:14:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/15/2003
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 10-15-2003-1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 10-15-2003
Agenda - 10-15-2003-2
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 10-15-2003
Agenda - 10-15-2003-3
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 10-15-2003
Agenda - 10-15-2003-4
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 10-15-2003
Agenda - 10-15-2003-ws
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 10-15-2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
There are some manmade constraints on this property - primarily a high voltage <br />distribution line that comes into a substation. There is also the rail corridor cutting <br />through the southwest corner of the site. The topography is desirable for building <br />lOtS. <br />He spoke about the development in Chapel Hill and the millions of square feet of <br />office space, etc., being built. This will create more jobs, which will require more <br />workers that need housing ar public transportation. He said that the need exists to <br />provide homes far the growing workforce. The Town has adopted an Urban Services <br />Boundary and the properties left on the northern edge are the fringe. <br />He said that Chapel Hill's comprehensive plan serves as a guide for what we would <br />like to see the community build out and look like. Zoning is what implements the <br />comprehensive plan. The density designated for this area is 4-8 units per acre. He <br />spoke about the different densities in the adjoining properties. <br />The vision for this site is for a medium density residential site of 4-8 dwelling units <br />per acre. They think that this is the right designation of density for this site. There is <br />full infrastructure in place, I-40 is in close proximity to this site as well as the park and <br />ride lot, there are express buses available, there is a passibility of a future <br />transportation corridor along the railway, water and sewer is readily available to the <br />site, retail goods and services are nearby, and there are two major employment <br />centers in close proximity to this site (Public Works facility in progress and a mixed <br />use office). This site is not adjacent to an existing neighborhood. Based on present <br />infrastructure, they believe that an argument could easily be made that this site is <br />appropriate for high-density residential uses. <br />The property owner has agreed to accept a zoning condition that the maximum <br />density be 7.95 units per acre (278 dwelling units}. They are also willing to accept a <br />condition to the zoning amendment to provide 15% of the dwelling units as affordable <br />units. This would be internally subsidized by the development. <br />Regarding the staff concerns, there was concern expressed that the floor area ratio <br />associated with this is not consistent with a medium density residential development. <br />He said that only 213 of the site is generating usable floor area. The special use <br />permit calls for about 85°~ of the available floor area. The units are roughly 1,100 <br />square feet. He said that anything less would be more studio in nature and an <br />entirely different market than they think should be served here -families and working <br />class people. He asked the boards to favorably consider this development for <br />approval. <br />Suzanne Haff said that she is a resident of the Northwood community on the corner <br />of Airport Road and Eubanks Road. She said that they are not opposed to this <br />development. She wants to know about the parking spaces per unit and how many <br />guest parking spaces there are per unit. She felt that there were not enough parking <br />spaces. She also wants to know if there are any restrictions on apartments to <br />prevent 15 working men to rent an apartment. This is a typical pattern that <br />happened in similar places where she has lived before. She asked if there could be <br />some restrictions to serve families and working class people and not be packed <br />unnaturally. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.