Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
12 <br />f <br />1 adequately come out to discuss critically a condition that might not occur for 10 years down the <br />2 road. He said that the County was setting itself up for streamline adoption of some towers in <br />3 places where they are ill fit and without public notice. <br />4 <br />s Bryan said that some consideration should be given to the idea of a broader standard for a public <br />6 body to hear some public input from people who are affected by it to turn a tower down. He also <br />7 agrees with McAdams. <br />e <br />9 Price agrees with the last three comments. <br />10 <br />11 Lasris also agrees and he said that the public is left out of this because it is an ordinance for the <br />12 telecommunication companies and not the public. <br />13 <br />14 Tadd thinks that we have been forced to approve this, because of a re -set time frame. She said it <br />is is being reshed through without enough time to do a proper review. <br />16 <br />17 Chair Gooding -Ray said that she agrees. The reason she voted for this because she does not want <br />is the moratorium to end without having something in place. She thinks there needed to be several <br />19 more hours discussion on this issue. <br />20 <br />21 Goodwin said that these towers do provide a public service and this has been neglected in the <br />22 conversation.. <br />23 <br />24 AGENDA ITEM #10: INFORMATIONAL ITEMS <br />25 Board Appointments — no new applicants <br />26 News article from Barry Jacobs re: Limits on Groundwater use in Charleston <br />27 Thursday, November 7, 2002 meeting <br />28 <br />29 AGENDA ITEM #11: ADJOURNMENT <br />30 With no further items to consider, the meeting was adjourned at 11:10 p.m. <br />31 <br />32 Nicole Gooding -Ray, Chair <br />33 <br />34 Becky Butler, Minutes Preparer <br />113 <br />