Browse
Search
P ORD-2002-030 Telecommunications Tower Ordinance Amendments
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2002
>
P ORD-2002-030 Telecommunications Tower Ordinance Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 2:09:00 PM
Creation date
4/23/2012 4:48:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/6/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Resolution
Agenda Item
9b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20021106
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ii <br />.: <br />1 MOTION: Katz moved to accept this language. Seconded by Goodwin. <br />2 <br />3 VOTE: Ayes, 8; No, .1 (Bryan) <br />4 <br />s Item #11: 6.18.4(b) — "will be minimally visually intrusive" on page 13. <br />6 <br />7 MOTION: Katz moved to accept this language. Seconded by Goodwin. <br />8 - <br />9 VOTE: Ayes, 8; No, 1 (Bryan) <br />10 <br />11 Item #12: 8.8.17a.2(d) regarding light spill and light source on page 22. <br />12 <br />13 MOTION: Katz moved to approve this language. Seconded by Schofield. <br />14 <br />is VOTE: Ayes, 8; No, 1 (Bryan) <br />16 <br />17 Item #13: Lightning rod issue on page 10. (Language placed in ordinance.) <br />is <br />19 MOTION: Katz moved to approve the language about lightning rods being considered part of <br />20 the overall height. Seconded by Goodwin. <br />21 <br />22 VOTE: Ayes, 5; No, 4 (McAdams, Price, Bryan, Gooding -Ray) <br />23 <br />24 Bryan said that the public's perspective about the meaning of this in terms of the lighting issue <br />25 and how the other sections of the ordinance handle lighting is unclear in terms of this particular <br />26 requirement. He said that this is a last minute suggestion. <br />27 <br />28 The last issue is about the fees. <br />29 <br />30 MOTION: Katz moved to recommend the fee ordinance as amended by staff. Seconded by <br />31 Goodwin. <br />32 <br />33 VOTE: Ayes, 8; No, f (McAdams — he thinks the fees are too high) <br />34 <br />35 VOTE ON ENTIRE ORDINANCE: <br />36 <br />37 MOTION: Katz moved to approve An Ordinance Amending the Zoning Ordinance of Orange <br />38 County. Seconded by Tadd. <br />39 <br />40 VOTE: Ayes, 5; No, 4 (McAdams, Bryan, Lasris, and Price) <br />41 <br />42 McAdams said that regarding the Master Telecommunication Plan, if there is a mass public <br />43 hearing with all the sites in it, everyone is not going to have the opportunity to state their reasons <br />44 long term to oppose or be in favor. <br />45 <br />46 Schofield said that the Master Telecommunication Plan is a mistake and the public will not <br />112 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.