Browse
Search
P ORD-2002-030 Telecommunications Tower Ordinance Amendments
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2002
>
P ORD-2002-030 Telecommunications Tower Ordinance Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 2:09:00 PM
Creation date
4/23/2012 4:48:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/6/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Resolution
Agenda Item
9b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20021106
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.... _ .... _._.. _..w..,: �._ ............... �.........._. . <br />9 110 <br />1 VOTE: Ayes, 7; No, 2 (Bryan and Price) <br />2 <br />3 Item #8: Regarding unforeseen events, the staff would be allowed discretion on what would be <br />4 considered an unforeseen event. <br />5 <br />6 VOTE: Ayes, 8; No, 1 (Bryan) <br />7 <br />8 Item #2: Add "6.18" to Section 6.18.2(d)(2) at the top of page 10 for clarification. <br />9 <br />10 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />11 <br />.12 Item #3: Ensure that there is access to co- locations by adding language to let consultant handle <br />13 market rent situation. <br />14 <br />i5 VOTE: Ayes, 7; No, 2 (McAdams and Bryan) McAdams does not think we should handle the <br />16 fee structure. <br />17 <br />18 Item #4: 6.18.4(f)(2)(b) — change in language — "a visual inspection from the ground shall be <br />19 conducted by a properly trained staff member of a tower provider or a consultant." <br />20 <br />21 VOTE: Ayes, 8; No, 1 (Bryan — he thinks we need someone from the County staff to pFotect the <br />22 public interest) <br />23 <br />24 Item #5:. Remove the inspection every 36 months, which is 6.18.4(f)(2)(a) on page 14. <br />25 <br />26 MOTION: McAdams moved to eliminate inspections for towers that do not have anything in <br />27 the fall zone other than their equipment, and that inspections occur every five years. After co- <br />28 locations, there would also be inspections after the fifth year, and not the third year. Seconded by <br />29 Goodwin. <br />30 <br />31 VOTE: Ayes, 2; No, 6 (Gooding -Ray, Bryan, Katz, Lasris, Price, Schofield, Tadd) - The <br />32 motion did not pass. <br />33 <br />34 MOTION: Schofield moved that there be no inspections for tower facilities that do not have <br />35 any other structures other than their own within the fall zone, and for towers that do, there will be <br />36 inspections every three years. Seconded by McAdams. <br />37 <br />38 VOTE: Ayes, 6; No, 3 (Bryan, Gooding -Ray, and Lasris — It is in the public's best interest <br />39 is to inspect all towers on a regular basis.) <br />40 <br />41 Item #6: Remove "current" from (f)(5)(e) on page, 16. <br />42 <br />43 MOTION: McAdams moved to remove "current" as stated above. Seconded by Katz. <br />44 <br />45 There was a friendly amendment to replace "current" with "initial ". McAdams accepted this. <br />46 Seconded by Lasris. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.