Browse
Search
Minutes - 20030930
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Minutes - 20030930
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 3:56:58 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:13:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/30/2003
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-30-2003-
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 09-30-2003
Agenda - 09-30-2003-3
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 09-30-2003
Agenda - 09-30-2003-5
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 09-30-2003
Agenda - 09-30-2003-6
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 09-30-2003
Agenda - 09-30-2003-7a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 09-30-2003
Agenda - 09-30-2003-7b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 09-30-2003
Agenda - 09-30-2003-a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 09-30-2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Given the assumptions used {student population projections), the countywide tax <br />increase would be about 17 cents per hundred dollar-assessed valuation if a merger <br />were pursued to take effect July 1, 2005. <br />The report also talks about some of the capital and SAPFO implications. There <br />would need to be some revisions to the SAPFO and the impact fee technical report to <br />change the student generation rates that affect the maximum impact fees that can be <br />charged. <br />If merger did occur, the combined student projections for both school systems <br />could cause a potential delay in opening some of the planned new schools in the next <br />ten years. <br />Rad Uisser said that there are other approaches to equalize funding including a <br />countywide supplemental tax and a phase out of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro district tax, <br />increasing the County's general fund tax rate, and creating and implementing a special <br />district tax in the Orange County school system only. The district tax would require a <br />majority vote. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that one of the things in the last slide was the <br />hypothetical OCS district tax. In year one, it requires mare in the County system, but in <br />year ten, it is less. She said that 62°~ of students in the County are in the Chapel Hill- <br />Carrbora schools and 3$% are in Orange County schools. Regarding tax revenue, 64°~ <br />tames out of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro district and 36% from the Orange County district. <br />She asked if the staff were projecting that 64°~ of the revenue was coming from the <br />Chapel Hill-Carrboro district as it is now and 36% from the County. Rod Uisser said yes. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked why the OCS district tax would have to be 22 cents <br />versus the CHCCS district tax of 20 cents. Rad Uisser said that the figure of 22.4 cents <br />assumed that there would be a revaluation. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that they received supplemental information from the <br />CHCCS board last night, 20~" day membership figures for both school systems, and she <br />would like for all to get a copy of that. <br />Flicka Bateman asked if you have a merged school system and new facilities <br />come in line, where would they be located. She asked about the implications for the <br />rural buffer. Chair Brown said that in their capital-planning pipeline, there is the third <br />high school in Chapel Hill, another middle school for Orange County, and the elementary <br />school for Chapel Hill. These schools will be built as planned, but they do not know <br />about the other schools. <br />Commissioner Carey said that he knows there is speculation that the rural buffer <br />would be invaded. A merged system does not affect current land use plans and the <br />Board of County Commissioners does not have any future plans to change the permitted <br />uses in the rural buffer. He thinks that regardless of whether there is merger or not, <br />there is going to be continued growth in this County. If elected officials stick by their <br />decisions about what's possible in the rural buffer, then we do not have to worry about <br />schools invading the rural buffer. <br />Jim VIlard asked about the impact of school merger on property values. He <br />thinks there are two wonderful school systems. The general perception is that the <br />CHCCS is one of the top ten in the nation and is a magnet far people moving into the <br />community. If merger goes poorly or is perceived to go poorly, it may have impacts on <br />property value. If merger goes well, there may be tremendous growth throughout the <br />County. <br />Chair Brown said that it mayor may not have an impact. She said that our land <br />use planning is firmly in place as well as the joint agreements for the rural buffer. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.