Orange County NC Website
Superintendent Carraway said that the projections from DPI far OCS were very close to the total <br />membership as of the 20th day. <br />Chair Brawn asked Superintendent Pedersen haw the other school faired with the opening of <br />Rashkis. She asked if there was a good balance. Superintendent Pedersen said that there was a <br />pretty good balance. Rashkis opened with about 420 (capacity of 600). Scroggs is of some <br />concern because it has 640 students. This facility is overcrowded. The overcrowding at Seawell <br />came down about 200 students. After a difficult redistricting process, there is same balance. <br />There were eight mobile units added at the high schools. <br />Chair Brown made reference to a letter from the neighborhoods adjacent to the high schools that <br />said that the mobile units were not in keeping with the neighborhood. Superintendent Pedersen <br />said that the letter he received was from a design committee in Chapel Hill. The mobile units were <br />approved as part of the process. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked if OCS had another report giving more information like CHCCS. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis said that OCS probably does not have the money to print such a nice <br />brochure. <br />Superintendent Carraway said that she has not seen this information, but she will look at it and see <br />if this information can be passed along to the County Commissioners. <br />Commissioner Jacobs would like to look more closely at athletics and how many males and <br />females participate and the spending per athlete based on male and female athletes. He would <br />also like some information on where the college scholarships are being achieved by student <br />athletes in the two systems. He would like to discuss this at the next joint meeting. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked about the third high school and what happened to the football facility <br />that was going to be developed offsite, and if it was included in the $30 million. Valerie Foushee <br />said that it was not included in the $27.8 or the $30 million at this time. The initial planning was to <br />locate this facility offsite by upgrading another field. <br />Superintendent Pedersen said that they are looking at the fields that will be there, but they do not <br />envision a major football stadium. They do envision athletic fields there. They need to determine <br />what events could not be held on this site and where they might be held. They would like to look at <br />some alternatives that would allow the fields to be used 2417 with a particular type of turf. <br />Chair Brown made reference to a comment that the high school football programs should be <br />equivalent at all three high schools. She had someone ask her why this was such a driving force. <br />She asked if one of the schools could emphasize women's sports. <br />Lisa Stuckey sits as board liaison to the Chapel Hill High SGC and about a month ago the Athletic <br />Director came and told them that, at present, there are an equal number of sports for boys and <br />girls. This does not include cheerleading, because it is not considered a sport. Chapel Hill High <br />just voted to fund women's golf. Chapel Hill High is on par in terms of women's sports. <br />Gloria Foley distributed some smart growth information. She said that two other issues that the <br />smart growth experts talked about were placing schools closer to denser populations and making <br />sure that schools are on public transportation routes. Bath of these occur at the proposed third <br />high school site. <br />With no further items to address, a motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by <br />Commissioner Jacobs to adjourn the meeting at 9:30 p.m. <br />