Orange County NC Website
in a small room with two phones and a volunteer. Volunteers went to foster homes and gave <br />vaccines and transported animals to vets and otherfoster homes. In May of 1979, the new <br />shelter opened in Orange County. Since then, both the APS and the shelter have grown and <br />flourished. She said that the APS Board remains dedicated. She said that the shelter staff was <br />the unsung heroes. She said that since the incorporation of APS, the Orange County <br />community has viewed APS as the place to go for help with animals. <br />Suzy Cooke said that she has been a volunteer, foster parent and adog-training instructor. For <br />the past three years, she has been an APS Board member. She gave the top ten reasons for <br />continuing the contract with APS: <br />10. The media has had more fun making snide comments about us than Dave Letterman <br />did about Bill Clinton. <br />9. Animal Control likes us -they really like us. <br />8. Our shelter technicians know all the new ways to scoop poop and clean up cat litter. <br />6. The Cruelty Investigators don't throw up anymore when they go to investigate a case. <br />5. The staff that drive our vans are used to the 2 a.m. runs to pick up animals. <br />4. We've found homes for potbelly pigs, roosters, chickens, peacocks. <br />3. Our volunteers are rabid. Last year alone, we volunteered nearly 30,000 hours. <br />2. Our Board of Directors is being sued for their volunteer efforts and most of them are still <br />here. <br />1. We already know the names of all those mice that live in the walls. <br />Beverly Rockhill's staterrrertt is as follows: My name is Beverly Rackhill. I am a faculty member <br />in cancer epidemiology at UNC. I am a lifetime member of the APS, and my name is actually on <br />the plaque as having donated the aviary to the APS. <br />I made a statement at a BOCC meeting earlier in September about why I ended years of <br />volunteering and substantial donating to the APS. <br />I know that the staff at APS care deeply about animals. And I truly believe that the individuals <br />on the APS board, and the leaders of APS, care about animals. I am also sure that we could <br />say with equal sincerity that safety engineers at NASA care profoundly about astronauts' lives. <br />Nonetheless, the board of safety experts at NASA had the grace and dignity to resign last week, <br />quietly, with no excuses or blaming of others, when they realized they could no longer serve <br />effectively in their roles in the wake of the Columbia tragedy. <br />As rigorous studies of leadership and management styles tell us, the concept of groupthink is <br />very real. At APS, this concept comes to life. The board members whose individual concern for <br />animals is undisputed present a defensive, hostile, and condescending unified front to the <br />public. Donations are dawn, adoptions are dawn, and volunteering is down. I have a wide <br />circle of contacts in the professional, church, and animal welfare communities. Let me assure <br />you that, in contrast to (APS board president} Ms. Beyle's statement, this is not all about Mr. <br />Cramer and Ms. Reitman. Let me assure you that, in contrast to Ms. Illeano's {APS board <br />member} statement, we in the public DO have the ability to sift fact from fiction. None of us are <br />being brainwashed by the media, by Mr. Cramer, or by Ms. Reitman. I find such insinuations <br />against us, the public, and against our journalists to be but further signs of disrespect and <br />condescension. <br />Commissioners, trust your intuition and your heart here. No one in this room, not even Mr. <br />Cramer or Ms. Reitman, wants to see the institution of the APS go under. But no one wants <br />