Minutes - 20030915 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

everybody back then to be careful that this train must be watched as it went dawn the tracks because it could take off and I would still put that caution out there. This is still a Commissioner's goal that we take upon ourselves, and I might add, that we have a booklet probably twice the size of this one with our goals and objectives, some of which we have been working for 14 or 15 or 16 years, and we haven't fulfilled those yet. So I take this with a word of caution because sometimes people read into things more than may be there and before you know it everything starts spinning out of control rather quickly. Some of the public comments that have been made show me that some of that spin has already taken place. On page 20 of this presentation this evening that everybody should have in front of them, the top block, the Manager's staff, and by the way John I think this is an amazing document and if anybody on your staff is looking far a Doctoral Dissertation topic I think you have already completed a significant amount of the work right here and they should run off and get their degree immediately. It says the hypothetical countywide supplemental tax. I find those two words are really interesting but we don't have any more, other than those two words. It says it could be part of a merger plan or an alternative thereto. So that alternative thereto, Madam Chair, I'd like to know what that really is because it is a couple of banes that need some meat on it- it needs some flesh. So if we are into this goal of looking at all aspects of a passible merger, what is this "alternative thereto"? I would couple that with if we are going to start talking about alternatives thereto, how does that deal with the issue of capital needs, because we heard that the merger issue would take care of the capital plan because it would delay and postpone same of the construction. But what does the alternative thereto do to the capital plan? I want to have that against a backdrop of a bigger question, is bigger better? Or is smaller better? And I couple that with Governor Easley a couple of weeks ago shaking hands with somebody representing the Gates Foundation where the state got I don't know how many millions of dollars to look at the prospect of making high schools smaller in the state, just one piece of the puzzle. So which way are we going on this thing and if we are looking at all aspects of this, I think we need to be very careful. I know obviously the ten-year scenario for the hypothetical countywide supplemental tax is interesting because of the impact of the final analysis. But I think the alternative thereto needs to be investigated. And are we saying that, and I listened very carefully to Shirley Carraway, and I listened very carefully to Neil Pedersen, and I read the findings of their respective groups and so they have got twice as many club opportunities for children in Chapel Hill-Carrboro Schools than they have in Orange County Schools. There were interesting vocational opportunities for children in Chapel Hill-Carrboro and there were interesting vocational opportunities for children in Orange County. There is a rather interesting leveling of the playing field when it comes to honors courses and advanced placement courses, which I think some people, may have been surprised. Students are students, having spent most of my lifetime dealing with teenagers in one form or another. All parents should have at least one, some chose to have mare than one for their own peculiar reasons. But having been a principal for seventeen years, there is an amazing thing about watching high school kids get together from both ends of the county. There are more things that bring them together than divide them and set them apart. I think the kids need to be the focal point of all our deliberations and discussions as we study this topic. And adults may have one perspective and students