Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />,~ Budget Amendment #14 <br />The Board considered approving the budget, grant and capital project ordinance <br />amendments for fiscal year 2002-03. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked for more information an page five and the <br />expenditures. She asked for the staff to come up with a chart on how to decide what <br />the share of the budget is. Rod Visser said that basically the portion of the budget <br />far education is current expense, recurring capital, long-range capital outlay, debt <br />service, and a small amount for the school health nurse program. He will give a <br />more specific answer at a later time. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Carey to <br />approve the budget, capital, and grant project ordinances for countywide, DSS, <br />Efland Sewer Fund, 1121118 North Churton Street Capital Project Ordinance, <br />Register of Deeds, Health Department, and Sheriff. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />r. Approval of Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Capital Project Ordinances and Grant <br />Project Ordinances <br />The Board considered adopting the capital project ordinances and grant project <br />ordinances for FY 2003-2004. <br />Commissioner Jacobs made reference to page 16, Central Northern Orange Senior <br />Center Capital Project Ordinance, and that there was some discussion about trying <br />to treat both senior centers equally and spend a relatively equal rate. One center <br />has $400,000 and one center has $100,000, and he was trying to remember if they <br />were going to catch up next year. Rod Visser said that they are going to catch up <br />eventually. He will write it up and reiterate the timeline for this and the explanation <br />for the difference. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis <br />to adopt the accompanying capital project ordinances and grant project ordinances. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />9. ITEMS FOR DECISION--REGULAR AGENDA <br />a-1. Reconsideration of APS Contract <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner <br />Jacobs (for purpose of discussion) to extend the three-month APS contract to six months. <br />Commissioner Carey said that they are scheduled to get the HSUS report in <br />September and then the Board of County Commissioners will want to review it and share it with <br />the public and have at least one public hearing. It will probably take more than one month to do <br />this. He said that regardless of what the Board does, it would take until the end of the year to <br />implement any change. He thinks the contract has a clause where it can be changed in a <br />certain amount of time. <br />Geof Gledhill said that because the contract was only extended for three months, <br />there was not any paint in leaving the 90-day termination provision in. The contract is good far <br />three months, and thereafter, it is month to month. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that it was a compromise to reflect what the Board <br />had decided. She said that if the two County Commissioners that did not want to extend it at all <br />