Minutes - 20030616 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

architects how much money you have and what you can afford, they will bring forth a design that will work. He thanked Commissioner Jacobs for this proposal. Commissioner Gordon said that, if the Commissioners will not support the school board's $33.9 million proposal, then she would like to put forward the figure of $32.3 million for the high school. She compared this amount to the cost of building the school at the Eubanks Road site, if the land cost is included. She thinks this amount is what it would take to build this school at the Eubanks Road site. She suggested in Commissioner Jacobs' proposal, #5, that the lowest amount be $30 million without conditions and the higher amount be $32.3 million with conditions. She thinks the County Commissioners should give the school board the money and tell them to go out and build the school. Chair Brown said that she wants the high school to be built as soon as possible, but it has varied over time. She was never in favor of the eminent domain issue. This could put the County in a difficult financial situation. She sees this facility as an important piece of construction for the CHCCS board. But she has to listen to John Link and when the final proposal came, the Manager did not recommend the amount of money the school system wanted. She said that this proposal by the school board could damage the County's fiscal situation in the next few years. It is clear that adopting this full proposal would also put the school system in a position of not being able to do the renovations and maintenance necessary to maintain the existing schools. She agrees with Commissioner Halkiotis in that we can give money to the architect and they will deliver a wonderful high school. She said that all could work together to build a school that will live up to the expectations. She gave her support to the motion on the floor. Commissioner Gordon asked if anyone else supported her suggestion of changing section #5 of Commissioner Jacobs' proposal from $27.8 million without conditions to $30 million without conditions. She argued strongly that the standards are essentially $30 million and the County should allot this amount. Commissioner Halkiotis said that the way he reads it is that the Manager, Superintendent Neil Pedersen, the Chair of the school board, and the Chair of the Board of County Commissioners need to meet to discuss the finer points of #5. He likes this smart growth school model. He is also worried that the owner of the land has no intentions of taking only $1.5 million far this land. Commissioner Carey asked to hear from school board members, if they like. Superintendent Neil Pedersen said that they need a decision as soon as possible, but he struggles with this as a motion. He sees five different suggestions as to ways to go about it. He asked for clarification that the motion would basically be for $30 million for the third high school with the plans subject to approval by the County Commissioners and the County Manager. Within the $30 million, they may need to re-look at capacity and core to meet projected growth needs. Commissioner Jacobs said that there are five alternatives but #5 essentially says that the school board should figure it out and let the Board of County Commissioners know what they are doing.