Orange County NC Website
ORANGE COUNTY FIRE RESCUE STUDY <br />INTRODUCTION <br />1 7. We evaluated the most appropriate location(s) for deploying personnel and <br />2 appazatus and have made recommendations to the County <br />3 8. We evaluated the various departments and their current human resources, <br />4 how those resources aze deployed (within the context of apparatus, <br />5 residence, and station assignment), and their adequacy to meet the <br />6 situational demands of emergency service. <br />7 9. We evaluated the current status and use of apparatus. In particular we were <br />8 concemed with maintenance and lifespan, capital replacement schedule, <br />9 funding and alternative funding sources to be considered. <br />10 10. We evaluated those aspects of County Administration where the <br />11 involvement of fire and rescue departments can be of assistance to plans and <br />12 programs and will help in the delivery of fire and rescue services. In <br />13 parti.cular, looked at: <br />14 a. Subdivision Planning; <br />15 b. Water lines; <br />16 c. Transportation arteries; <br />17 d. Street design (cul-de-sacs, gated communities, etc.) <br />18 11. We reviewed current departments' ISO ratings. We verbally made <br />19 recommendations to each of the departments on how they might improve <br />20 their ratings. We discussed how the county might assist fire departments <br />21 with improvement. <br />22 12. We reviewed current training practices and facilities, including the role of <br />23 azea community college support. We aLso: <br />24 a. Identified countywide training facility needs; <br />25 b. Identified specific training standazds such as mass casualty response <br />26 and standard equipment; and, <br />27 c. Reviewed training programs in light of how they relate to the <br />28 implementadon of mutual aid agreements. <br />29 13. We performed a financial analysis of the costs for operating departments <br />30 within the framework of that which we have outlined. That analysis has <br />31 been translated into tax rate funding for each of the departments. <br />32 <br />6 <br /> <br />• <br />