Orange County NC Website
Commissioner Halkiotis said that he would support Commissioner Jacobs' <br />request and look at taking the money for the meritorious service awards and use it <br />towards moving the employees up to a housing wage. He said that he has never been <br />an advocate of the meritorious service awards. He said that the Sheriff expects his <br />employees to live in Orange County and even $800 a month is difficult for some <br />employees. <br />Commissioner Carey said that the County should set an example and pay a <br />living wage that allows the staff to live in Orange County. <br />Elaine Holmes said that there are 200 employees below the two-bedroom rate <br />and 66 below the one bedroom rate. <br />Commissioner Jacobs would like to look at alternatives to catch everybody up to <br />the housing wage within two years. <br />Chair Brown asked about the compression of the pay plan and Elaine Holmes <br />said that if the minimum wage was increased to a certain level then there are issues in <br />terms of employee and supervisory relationships. <br />Steve Condrey said that you could do this in increments and you would not have <br />to compress all salaries. <br />Commissioner Carey said that we should move in this direction in principle and <br />keep an eye on the compression issue. <br />Chair Brown said that she would like to understand the $27,000 living wage for a <br />one-bedroom apartment. This is assuming that the person is not married and they are <br />paying the absolute maximum rent that the County has. She said that this does not <br />necessarily show what is going on in the community. She asked if the 66 employees <br />would mainly be in the Sheriff's Department. Elaine Holmes said that the 66 employees <br />involve those throughout the County -convenience center operators, office assistants, <br />custodians, nursing assistants, etc. <br />Elaine Holmes will bring back some options about the housing wage. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked about a revenue neutral way of doing this pay plan. <br />For example, instead of giving an increase of 2.5% at four and seven years of service, <br />give 2% at five and ten years of service. There might be some money left over to bring <br />the 66 employees up to a housing wage. <br />Commissioner Gordon made reference to the stepless schedule and said that we <br />should do it for a while and not change it in two years. <br />Commissioner Gordon made reference to the analyses on the gender and race <br />equity and there is a significant difference in the sense that females get paid less than <br />males and whites get paid less than non-whites. She would like to keep tabs on this. <br />Steve Condrey said that we could look at this internally but overall there are no <br />systematic biases to the pay plan. Also, he said that he agrees about the stepless <br />salary schedule. Secondly, he would keep the 2.5°~ increase because it would help the <br />compression. <br />Chair Brown asked if adoption would be far two years far the pay plan. Elaine <br />Holmes said that the proposal is for the Board to adopt the classifications, the salary <br />grades, the stepless salary schedule, and the salary administration to move people up to <br />the new minimum, and grant the first 2.5°l0. On the other service-based increases, they <br />are proposing that the Board express its intent to came back and do it at the <br />recommended dates. <br />Chair Brown asked if the COLA would ever be a part of this. Steve Condrey said <br />that each year the scales should rise and the employees' salaries should also rise by the <br />same amount. The performance increases should be on top of this. <br />