Orange County NC Website
C � 02 <br /> 2 <br /> drinking water standards. However, the level of water-borne radon in some portions of the <br /> County was worthy of note. Wells tested in a southern-central portion of the County generally <br /> west-southwest of Carrboro revealed higher than normal readings. This area conforms <br /> generally to an underlying granitic pluton, the likely source of the high radon readings. In all, <br /> sixty-seven percent of the radon activities measured in the County exceeded the USEPA <br /> proposed maximum contaminant level. However, the evaluation of radon activity is complicated <br /> by the difficulty in measuring the aerated radon gas. While elevated and worthy of note, radon <br /> activity in Orange County was lower than that measured in Guilford County three years ago. <br /> Additional information on water-borne radon, how to test radon activity, and the potential issues <br /> were provided in a fact sheet developed by Environmental Health in April 2001. <br /> Among the other water quality findings was the incidence of some wells with an elevated level <br /> of the naturally-occurring trace metals iron and manganese, which commonly cause staining of <br /> plumbing fixtures and other nuisance problems. <br /> The Report of the Water Resources Committee from March 2001 pulls together the many <br /> findings of the last several years, and assesses the implications of the USGS report. On pages <br /> 18-19 of the report are a list of 10 findings by the Committee, followed by six recommendations <br /> offered for further consideration by the Commission for the Environment and the Board of <br /> Commissioners. These recommendations include: <br /> • The need for further research into the radon results in south-central Orange, perhaps in <br /> conjunction with Chatham County. <br /> • An ongoing ground water monitoring program to evaluate changes over time in areas seeing <br /> new development <br /> • Consideration for a comprehensive water budget approach to link surface and ground water <br /> planning <br /> • Review of sustainable ground water yields and land use policies in some watersheds of the <br /> County, based on the available information about ground water recharge rates <br /> • A requirement that new subdivisions locate not only septic sites but also well sites prior to <br /> subdivision approval <br /> • The importance of water conservation for ground water based systems <br /> Note: Color versions of maps in the Committee report may be found in the accompanying USGS published report. <br /> In keeping with the Board's adopted Water Resource Quantity and Quality goal, the <br /> Commission for the Environment has assumed the mantle of the ground water project, after a <br /> transition meeting with the Water Resources Committee. A new CfE Water Resources <br /> Committee has been formed and is reviewing the Committee's report. On April 23, the two <br /> groups met to jointly review the Committee's findings and generate ideas on how the County <br /> might proceed in this vein. Discussion notes from this meeting are attached. The discussion <br /> notes conclude with suggestions related to the (original) Committee recommendations. <br /> FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact associated with receiving these reports. The <br /> Environmental Health Division has procured radon test kits for any citizens interested in testing <br /> radon in their homes (air test kits are $5 each and water test kits $10 each) <br /> RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board discuss the Water <br /> Resources Committee report, the USGS report and the discussion points and suggested <br /> actions included in the April 23 discussion notes. <br />