Agenda 05-28-2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

f 0026 Page 4 November 22 , 2000 decision from which an appeal moves to the courts should be with the governing board responsible for the development permitting. This is consistent with the legislation enabling the County and the Towns to issue development permits. Furthermore, it is not the responsibility of the board of education to "take ona ' developers when developments are stopped as the result of a CAPS denial. Since the planning government is ultimately responsible for the planning decision, any litigation related to the planning decision should follow a final administrative decision of the planning government. A final concern about the recommendation from the Schools and Land Use Councils on this point is that its proposal creates a never-ending loop. That is, there is no stopping point in the review by the planning government governing board of a CAPS denial decision. There is one other point of clarification in the MOU from that recommended by the Schools and Land Use Councils. The MOU recommended by the Board of County Commissioners calls for school district building capacity to be determined by joint action of the applicable Board of Education and the Orange County Board of Commissioners. These two governmental units partner in school facilities. There must be agreement between them with respect to the all-important school district building capacity determination. On behalf of the Board of Commissioners, we look forward to the public hearing process regarding the Adequate Public School Facilities program and ultimately implementing the program. We look forward to your continued support. Sincerely, ))�I Moses Carey, r Chair, Orange County Board of Commissioners MC/lsg Enclosures lsg:letters\mosescareyletterreschoolsadegpubfac.ltr