Browse
Search
NS ORD-2002-011 Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment: Article 9. Signs
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2002
>
NS ORD-2002-011 Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment: Article 9. Signs
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 2:14:16 PM
Creation date
3/27/2012 8:30:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/21/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
8a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20020521
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12 <br />needed to be conveyed to the public. The administration recommends that the proposed <br />amendment be referred to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the <br />Board of County Commissioners no sooner than May 21, 2002. <br />Public Comment <br />Pierre Morin, the petitioner, said that he was one of four builders in Churton <br />Grove subdivision. He said that it was a little difficult to compete without showing new <br />homebuyers the differences in each of their products. He said that a 2'x2' sign was not <br />sufficient because most homebuyers would see the first house and assume that it was the only <br />builder in the subdivision. He said that 16 square feet might be larger, but it is not as large as <br />the Parade of Homes signs, which are 36x36'. He said that he was just showing to new <br />homebuyers their product as compared to other builders' products. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner <br />Gordon to refer the proposed amendment to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be <br />returned to the Board of County Commissioners no sooner than May 21, 2002. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />2. Orange County Hazard Mitigation Plan <br />Craig Benedict said that this item is in response to new legislation that was put <br />into effect in June 2001, also known as Senate Bill 300. It was an act to amend the laws <br />regarding emergency management as recognized by the legislation because of some of the <br />recent disasters in North Carolina such as flooding. In response to the legislative act, there was <br />a strong suggestion that any local government that would like to be in line for assistance in case <br />of future natural disasters should put together a hazard mitigation plan. If local governments are <br />interested in assistance funds, it is a requirement that they adopt a plan prior to August of this <br />year. The purpose of this item is to explain what a hazard mitigation plan includes. There was <br />a PowerPoint presentation. <br />Orange County worked with Greensboro and the Emergency Management <br />Division of North Carolina to develop this plan. The goal is to make residences and businesses <br />less vulnerable to impacts and have a coordinated approach through discussion between local <br />governments. Hurricanes, tornadoes, lightning, and snowstorms are some of the disasters that <br />have hit North Carolina in the past few years. Another part of the mitigation strategy is to <br />identify the junkyards and automobile establishments that are in the way of flooding because oil <br />and other liquids from the cars can get caught up in the flooding and cause further damage <br />downstream. Part of the requirement in the Senate bill is that the plan should be very strong in <br />the Planning aspect. Emergency Management is an up front participant, but the state wanted <br />the focus to be on planning to prevent structures from going into the floodplain or being placed <br />in hazardous areas. EMS typically comes in the reactive stage so the state wants planning to <br />be proactive to guide this in the areas of building, planning and erosion control. There has been <br />some development along floodplains in the past, and this needs to be identified. This draft plan <br />will be transmitted to the state for comment. The comments will come back and the final plan <br />can be submitted. Part of the requirement of the plan is to do training with the community. <br />Commissioner Brown asked if there were any counties in the east that were not <br />participating. Craig Benedict said that about 90% of the counties in the east were participating. <br />There are a few counties in the coastal areas that have not put it together. Some communities <br />do not have the ability, between their existing departments or staff, to put it together. <br />- The proposed action for this meeting is that we continue getting input from the <br />local governments in preparing the plan and bring back a transmittal version of the hazard <br />mitigation plan to the County Commissioners prior to June 1St. The state will send back their <br />comments in order for the County to send the plan back to the state by August 1 st. There is no <br />financial impact at this time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.