Minutes - 20030414 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

jurisdictions one more time. The SAPFO could be implemented by May or June of this year. Hillsborough also had questions about the impacts of Mebane and Durham on the Orange County School district and the staff is drafting a letter to answer their questions. Valerie Foushee asked about the funding for the CAPS administrator. Craig Benedict said that part of this CAPS implementation process is put together in the workbook. They have tried to put as much information upfront as possible. The majority of the work will be at the local government level. When they send out the last letter they will try to elaborate on this issue. e. School Siting Initiative John Link deferred to Commissioner Jacobs. Commissioner Jacobs said that he, the Chair, and the Manager met today to talk further about this item. He deferred to the Manager to go into the details of what was discussed. The attachment is 1-e. John Link made reference to the last page and said that they want to identify by the Assembly of Governments meeting the advantages of this type of collaboration. The idea is to agree on identifying school sites proactively. The incentive would be that the County would commit to funding the acquisition of school sites in the same way that it is proactively funding the acquisition of conservation easements and land for the Lands Legacy program. The acquisition of a school site would not be part of the whole school project as it is now. This was what was discussed in the meeting today. Commissioner Jacobs added that the municipalities have planning expertise and familiarity with their awn land use planning. This would be a way to get ahead of the curve and to develop a comprehensive plan. The next bond funding could also be the acquisition of identified sites for future school use and get it out of the way. This would be a smoother, more assured process. This would get the towns involved more and tap into expertise that exists in the municipalities. Chair Brown invited the school boards to the AOG meeting on the 29t" of April. Commissioner Gordon made reference to the school/park reserve fund that was one cent put aside on the tax rate every year to be used far the purchase of future school sites. She said that the County has gradually gone away from this and now there is na money going to this fund. Also, in the Schools and Land Use Council, they have discussed some of these issues. Chapel Hill has a comprehensive plan that has identified school sites. Many of them have been developed or are no longer suitable. There are not many sites left. Carrboro also had school sites an their land use plan but the County purchased those Eubanks Road sites. Hillsborough did not express interest because there is not a lot of area in their jurisdiction. Orange County did discuss putting sites in the comprehensive plan. There were a number of identified sites in Orange County and they generated an unfavorable reaction so it has not been pursued further. She hopes that any new initiative would take into account these historical paints and what kind of collaboration we have done in the past. Keith Cook said that what the document covers is what the school boards have done all along. He does not like that the document refers to them not being trained and having a lack of understanding. He said that this is not fair. One of the authorities of school boards by law is to site schools. He said that both school boards have put about ten schools an the ground compared to one or two buildings that the County has built. The document is not respectful and he asked that we be careful with the language. Chair Brown said that we could move toward positive ways to look at collaboration and refer it back to the school boards and to the Board of County Commissioners. f. Need far Dialogue with Chapel Hill and Carrboro on Public Transportation for Schools