Browse
Search
Minutes - 20030224
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Minutes - 20030224
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 4:20:47 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:08:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/24/2003
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-24-2003-
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 02-24-2003
Agenda - 02-24-2003-c1a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 02-24-2003
Agenda - 02-24-2003-c1b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 02-24-2003
Agenda - 02-24-2003-c1c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 02-24-2003
Agenda - 02-24-2003-c2a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 02-24-2003
Agenda - 02-24-2003-jpa
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 02-24-2003
Agenda - 02-24-2003-ws
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 02-24-2003
Agenda - 02-24-2003-ws1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 02-24-2003
Agenda - 02-24-2003-ws2
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 02-24-2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
this could not be Burlington ar Graham. It was a small car dealership out in White Cross area, <br />that looked like there was same sort of major sale going an there. <br />"So even some small projects can have quite an impact upon the rural environment. <br />Besides the businesses and residences, this light pollution can affect the enjoyment of the night, <br />the dark sky, and enjoyment by the neighbors. You will also notice that driving conditions based <br />on inappropriate lighting can also cause hazards while driving. And energy conservation, we <br />just didn't want to limit it to light pollution, we understand that in our age of energy star housing <br />where we are reducing the amount of energy necessary for housing, there is also a way of <br />reducing the amount of energy for lighting and you have noticed the different color-coded <br />lighting out there." <br />"There are certain types of lighting that are high-energy cansumption. And what we are <br />suggesting, at least at the public hearing stage, is the prohibition of mercury vapor lighting, <br />which is, as we have analyzed, high-energy consumption. And there is a chart which we will go <br />to next that gives an example of some of the lighting fixtures that are available and some of the <br />costs that accrue to the people who pay the bill afterwards." <br />"Now we also understand that the costs of the initial installation is part of the capital <br />improvement and costs of providing these facilities, but also if you take a lank at the cast of the <br />electric service afterwards, by reducing this long term electric cansumption, the need and <br />dependency on sources of electricity could be brought down. <br />"Also another initiative that we are taking a look at is where possible and where feasible <br />and applicable, we are encouraging the use of solar lighting, and solar lighting technology which <br />has over the last five years moved forward in leaps and bounds and we are interested in <br />proceeding with some sort of solar lighting application at our building in Orange County. The <br />lighting was knocked down in a storm a few years and we are still without signs and without <br />lighting and sa we hope to have some new technology for solar lighting for the sign. This is just <br />a quick chart of energy conservation -low pressure sodium, 35 watts, annual operating costs <br />about $19.00, high pressure sodium -75 watt fixtures, about $30.00, middle halide- 100watt <br />bulbs, $37.00 approximately, and mercury vapor -175 watts, $67.00. <br />"So you can see almost 3'/2 times the cost of providing lighting with different types of <br />fixtures and applications. Now there is a combination- it doesn't mean that you have to provide <br />3'h times as many lighting fixtures as low-pressure sodium to make the project work. This is <br />just an example of what we have done in energy conservation analysis to make sure that future <br />lights take that into consideration. We hope that the benefits abound and to improve driving <br />conditions but still allowing far appropriate security for people that want to preserve their <br />property, using conservation measures to reduce our dependency an electricity, using these <br />solar opportunities, supporting the dark skies initiative so people can enjoy the stars out there. <br />And also taking a look at lighting so that it is used for its intended purposes of security and <br />invisibility and using crime prevention through environmental design techniques. So those are <br />some of the positive consequences. <br />"So that is in essence where we are going with the new amendments to our lighting <br />standards. That is all for the presentation that Robert has tonight. We did recognize a note that <br />came in from Duke Power that mentioned a few sections of our Ordinance. I just read this <br />before the meeting and they said that some parts of the ordinance were good and they would <br />like to work with us on some other parts that discussed such as the prohibition of mercury halide <br />lights. We do have certain clauses about how this would apply to new development and things <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.