Browse
Search
Minutes - 20030224
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Minutes - 20030224
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 4:20:47 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:08:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/24/2003
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-24-2003-
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 02-24-2003
Agenda - 02-24-2003-c1a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 02-24-2003
Agenda - 02-24-2003-c1b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 02-24-2003
Agenda - 02-24-2003-c1c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 02-24-2003
Agenda - 02-24-2003-c2a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 02-24-2003
Agenda - 02-24-2003-jpa
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 02-24-2003
Agenda - 02-24-2003-ws
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 02-24-2003
Agenda - 02-24-2003-ws1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 02-24-2003
Agenda - 02-24-2003-ws2
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 02-24-2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Brown made reference to attachment three and the number of employees making <br />below $40,000. <br />Commissioners Jacobs and Carey asked same clarifying questions which were answered <br />by Elaine Holmes. <br />John Link said that the staff was comfortable with the twa items under phase 1 in <br />attachment four. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis said that he would like to see some variations of phasing it in over <br />a two to three year period. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked for some clarification on the salary steps, which was provided <br />by Elaine Holmes. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked for additional copies of the plan for the study. Elaine Holmes <br />said that she could provide the handouts that the consultant spoke on in February, but they have <br />not received the full report yet because the study is not complete. <br />Commissioner Carey asked for a comment from Elaine Holmes on the steps that need to <br />be completed and the time and cost. Elaine Holmes said that she estimates that they could bring <br />the study back to the Board in two to three months. The original cost of the study for the <br />consultant contract was $71,250. She does not anticipate any additional costs to finish the study. <br />Chair Brown asked if the Board was interested in continuing this study and everyone <br />agreed. <br />Chair Brown verified that if the plan is fully implemented then the increase in cost is <br />$2,500,000. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked how the hiring freeze figures into this and when it would be <br />implemented. John Link said that it would be at the end of the fiscal year as opposed to the end of <br />the calendar year. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that he recalls that the staff was supposed to come back to the <br />Board if there were extraordinary circumstances or any emergency positions that needed to be <br />filled. John Link said that they have addressed less than 10 positions that were critical during the <br />hiring freeze. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked if it was passible for the consultants to show quarter steps <br />and Elaine Holmes said yes. <br />John Link said that regardless of whether the Beard pursues attachment 4 or attachment 5, <br />the one step that needs to be pursued as soon as passible is the one step (2.5%) service based <br />increase for all employees. The study confirms that this needs to be done. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked what exactly the Board was committing itself to -the plan the <br />way the consultant proposed it or a modified version. <br />John Link said that he has to sit down and talk with the department heads and staff and talk <br />about the consultant's recommendations. <br />Chair Brown clarified that the Board has agreed to go ahead with the pay and classification <br />study. She is not hearing a solid response on deciding on either of the alternatives tonight. When <br />the Board does decide on the implementation, then an active date needs to be determined. <br />John Link said that the staff is recommending that the plan be made retroactive April 14t" <br />The money is in the budget for this. <br />Commissioner Gordon wants the study to go forward, but she wants to see it before she <br />commits to it. She still has questions. <br />Discussion ensued about the next steps. <br />Commissioner Jacobs made reference to the housing living wage and asked if all of the <br />employees were above the housing living wage. Elaine Holmes said that she would look and see <br />where the County stands on this. The housing wage for a family of four is $31,000. <br />Commissioner Jacobs would like to see what positions are below this and haw long they <br />have been in their jobs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.