Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
5 <br /> 1 EDE-1 Doesn't Allow: <br /> 2 ■ Agricultural <br /> 3 ■ Construction <br /> 4 ■ Information <br /> 5 ■ Manufacturing, Assembly & Processinq <br /> 6 ■ Recreation <br /> 7 ■ Wholesale Trade <br /> 8 ■ Economic Development Eno Higher Intensity (EDE-2) <br /> 9 EDE-2 Allows: <br /> 10 ■ Agricultural <br /> 11 ■ Construction <br /> 12 ■ Finance <br /> 13 ■ Government <br /> 14 ■ Manufacturing, Assembly & Processinq <br /> 15 ■ Retail <br /> 16 ■ Services <br /> 17 ■ Transportation <br /> 18 ■ Wholesale Trade <br /> 19 EDE-2 Doesn't Allow: <br /> 20 ■ Information <br /> 21 ■ Recreation <br /> 22 ■ Residential <br /> 23 <br /> 24 Recommendations <br /> 25 1. Receive the proposal to amend: <br /> 26 a. Land Use <br /> 27 b. Zoning <br /> 28 2. Conduct the Public Hearing and receive public, BOCC and Planning Board comments, <br /> 29 3. Refer the matter to Planning Board to be returned for BOCC action by April 17, 2012, <br /> 30 4. Adjourn the Public Hearing until April 17, 2012 to receive any written comments between <br /> 31 February 27, 2012 and Planning Board recommendation. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Eno Neighborhood Meeting <br /> 34 Citizen Comments <br /> 35 1. Stoney Creek Basin EDE-1 vs. EDE-2 <br /> 36 The EDE-2 is suggested by staff because of the frontage along 1-85 and its relative <br /> 37 isolation between the interstate, Mt. Herman Church Road, railroad tracks, and high <br /> 38 voltage primary electric transmission lines. The opposite side of the road is also <br /> 39 EDE-2. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 2. Resource Protection Areas (RPA) <br /> 42 RPAs are a layer of the land use plan and are still operational. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 3. What is light industrial compare Orange County and Durham County? <br /> 45 The uses were discussed during the Eno EDD SAP meetings and comparability was <br /> 46 achieved. <br /> 47 <br /> 48 4. Why now? Public utilities <br /> 49 This area has been noted as an urban growth land use since 1981 and reconfirmed <br /> 50 in 1994 and 2008. Orange County is facilitating the proposed land use pattern since <br />