Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-22-2012 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 03-22-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 03-22-2012 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2015 2:09:10 PM
Creation date
3/16/2012 4:14:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/22/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 03-22-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 <br /> 1 5. How land is used is a major factor in many aspects of people's lives. Land Use directly <br /> 2 affects people's quality of life in a variety of ways. Community character, traffic generation <br /> 3 and flow, availability of services and the quality of the natural environment are all affected by <br /> 4 Land Use decisions. Indeed, one of local government's principal powers is the authority to <br /> 5 control land development so that growth is managed in such a way that negative impacts are <br /> 6 minimized and mitigated. <br /> 7 6. Preserve stream corridors and create a network of publicly-accessible trails between <br /> 8 developed areas and the Eno River State Park to the north of the focus area and Duke <br /> 9 Forest to the south of the Focus Area. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Last week residents were informed about an interlocal agreement with Durham that had been <br /> 12 recently made. I can find no mention of this agreement anywhere on Orange County's website. This <br /> 13 agreement and the process that led to it should be made public. It concerns me that local residents <br /> 14 weren't informed that an interlocal agreement was being negotiated with the City of Durham. <br /> 15 Affected residents should have been informed and invited to be a part of the process. If the <br /> 16 agreement does not include provisions for the City of Durham to abide by the recommendations and <br /> 17 policies set forth in Shaping Orange County's future and the Eno Economic District small area plan <br /> 18 this should be added to ensure that Durham's policies are aligned with Orange County's. <br /> 19 Questions: <br /> 20 1. How will buffering and transitioning of existing and possible future, nonresidential <br /> 21 development be accomplished to avoid impacts on existing and new residences? <br /> 22 2. What types of additional nonresidential land uses are to be considered for the area and how <br /> 23 will their impact be mitigated? <br /> 24 3. What will be done to protect the environmental integrity of Duke Forest, and 'Eno River State <br /> 25 Park and Stoney Creek? <br /> 26 <br /> 27 Robin Jacobs spoke on behalf of the Eno River Association. She is the Executive Director. <br /> 28 She served as the Chair of the Carrboro Planning Board for a little over ten years while the University <br /> 29 Lake Watershed Agreements and the Joint Planning Agreement were issued. She distributed a <br /> 30 handout. She pointed out a resource protection area that is along Stoney Creek. She said that the <br /> 31 Stoney Creek Plan does talk about higher, middle, and lower intensity uses. The plan is totally <br /> 32 focused on residential development and is not talking about higher intensity industrial uses. Her <br /> 33 concern is that Stoney Creek will have more industrial use. She said that just because there are <br /> 34 regulations, it does not mean that the County can control what happens. <br /> 35 Jennifer Gunter verified that her father's letter was received and entered into the record. <br /> 36 Jim Brown said that it was stated that there is currently no development proposed that is <br /> 37 pushing these zoning changes and that this is all in the planning phase. It was answered yes. <br /> 38 Jon Arvik asked about a sewage lift station. He has lived within ten miles of one of these at <br /> 39 one time. He is concerned about this. He would like to know where this station is and he would like <br /> 40 to have public input. He wants to know what it will look like, sound like, smell like, etc. He asked <br /> 41 what authority Orange County would have to resist the annexation by Durham. He said that he <br /> 42 moved here for a reason and he would like to maintain the quality of life. <br /> 43 Craig Benedict said that Orange County would not be choosing a consultant for engineering <br /> 44 design until later this summer. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.