Browse
Search
Minutes - 20030121
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Minutes - 20030121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 4:24:07 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:07:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/21/2003
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 01-21-2003-
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-10a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-5a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-5b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-6a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-7a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-7b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-8a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-8c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-8d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-8e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-8f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-8g
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-8h
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-8i
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-8j
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-8k
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-9a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-9b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-9c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-9d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-9e1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-9e2
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-9e3
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-9e4
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-9e5
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WHEREAS, the NCDOT-recommended alternative bridge height is below that of <br />the existing bridge, is below the recommended height for trail crossings <br />in the Federal Highway Administration Enhancement Program as well as the <br />standards of the American Society of Transportation Officials, is below the height of NCDOT's I-44 <br />crossing of New Hope Creek that is presently under construction, is below the height recommended <br />by the organizations mentioned in the previous paragraph, will impair trail maintenance activities, will <br />preclude use of the trail for equestrian activities in the future; and <br />WHEREAS, the public and private investments to protect the New Hope Creek <br />Corridor have exceeded $4.5 Million; and <br />WHEREAS, an increase of bridge length of 100 feet could protect public and private <br />preservation investments of over three times the additional construction cost of a longer bridge; and <br />WHEREAS, the original bridge construction over New Hope Creek used large <br />amounts of fill across the New Hope Creek floodplain which impacts the natural hydrologic and wildlife <br />functions of the corridor; and <br />WHEREAS, the NCDOT Environmental Assessment does not consider the potential <br />ecological and recreation advantages that could accrue were the new bridge to be constructed to <br />remediate these extensive and previous environmental impacts; and <br />WHEREAS, the NCDOT Draft Transportation Improvements Budget {TIP) for <br />2004-2010 budgets $7,325,000 far this construction project, while current <br />NCDOT construction estimates total only $6,850,000 for the project; and <br />WHEREAS, there presently exists an estimated $475,000 in the TIP project <br />budget which could fund approximately one-half of the requested additional <br />bridge length without impacting the project budget; and <br />WHEREAS, the NCDOT proposes to cross one of the most important natural <br />corridor in the Triangle with a bridge that limits the New Hope Creek corridor's trail <br />options and threatens the public and private investments made to establish a wildlife <br />corridor in cooperation with Gity of Durham, Durham County and the Town of Chapel Hril, <br />IVOW THEREFORE, BE !T RESOLVED THAT THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD <br />OF COMMISSIONERS requests the North Carolina Department of Transportation revise <br />the Environmental Assessment to give due consideration of alternatives that provide <br />better remediation of past environmental degradation along New Hope Creek; are more <br />protective of Orange County's plans for use of the New Hope Creek Corridor, more <br />protective of the public and private investments made to protect the corridor and more <br />attentive to the environmental improvements associated with a longer bridge length; <br />FURTHERMORE, the Board of Commissioners expresses its support for bridge alternatives <br />with lengths longer than the NCDOT-preferred alternative that would be more cost-effective, protect <br />previous public investments in the corridor, provide more environmental protection for wildlife, and <br />permit trail uses that are flexible and diverse; in particular, expresses support for a bridge that is at <br />least 10 feet high and 340 feet long as well as 122 feet wide; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.