Browse
Search
Minutes - 20030121
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Minutes - 20030121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 4:24:07 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:07:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/21/2003
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 01-21-2003-
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-10a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-5a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-5b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-6a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-7a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-7b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-8a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-8c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-8d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-8e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-8f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-8g
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-8h
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-8i
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-8j
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-8k
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-9a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-9b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-9c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-9d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-9e1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-9e2
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-9e3
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-9e4
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
Agenda - 01-21-2003-9e5
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 01-21-2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Orange County Board of Commissioners <br />supports restoration of funding to Project Homestart and pledges to petition federal elected officials to <br />assist the Inter-Faith Council in their restoration efforts. <br />This the 21St day of January 2443. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />b. Resolution In Suanart of Adeauate Bridae Lenath and Vertical Clearance for US 15- <br />501 Crossing of New Hope Creek <br />The Board considered a resolution in support of an Adequate Bridge Length and Vertical <br />Clearance for US 151541 Crossing of New Hope Creek. <br />Chair Brown said that this resalution was asking DOT to make the bridge wide and tall <br />enough to allow wildlife to proceed along the New Hope Creek floodplain corridor. This has been <br />adapted by the City of Durham and the Town of Chapel Hill. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to <br />approve and authorize the Chair to sign the resolution as stated below: <br />RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF ADEQUATE BRIDGE LENGTH AND VERTICAL CLEARANCE <br />FOR <br />US 151501 CROSSING OF NEW HOPE CREEK <br />WHEREAS, the State of North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) <br />in TIP Project U-4412 plans to expand US 151541 to six lanes between Mt. <br />Mariah Raad and Garrett Raad and such expansion will require removing and <br />rebuilding the bridge across New Hope Creek in this area; and <br />WHEREAS, the State of North Carolina Department of Transportation has <br />issued an Environmental Assessment dated July 7, 2442 in which the recommended bridge <br />alternative has a height of 8 feet, a length of 245 feet and a width of 122 feet; and <br />WHEREAS, Orange County has adopted the New Hope Creek Corridor Preservation Plan and <br />such plans anticipate the portion of the New Hope Creek corridor crossed by the bridge will provide <br />both recreation trail and wildlife corridor amenities: and <br />WHEREAS, the New Hope Creek Corridor is recognized as providing a <br />regionally significant wildlife corridor in the Piedmont by the State of North <br />Carolina's Natural Heritage Program; and <br />WHEREAS, the NCDOT-recommended alternative combination of bridge length, <br />height and width provides a wildlife crossing that is less protective than <br />other bridges NCDOT has under construction in the New Hope Creek <br />watershed and provides less wildlife protection than that called far in the mast recent scientific <br />literature; and <br />WHEREAS, the NCDOT-recommended alternative is less protective than that <br />recommended by the State of North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, <br />the City of Durham, Durham County, the Town of Chapel Hill, the New Hope Creek Corridor Advisory <br />Committee, the Durham Chapel Hill Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation <br />Advisory Committee and others {the Durham Open Space and Trails Commission and the New Hope <br />Audubon Society); and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.