Browse
Search
Minutes - 20021210
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Minutes - 20021210
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 4:25:38 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:06:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/10/2002
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 12-10-2002
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-5a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-5b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-6a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-8c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-8d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-8e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-8f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-8g
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-8h
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-8i
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-8j
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-8k
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-8l
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-9a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-9b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-9c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-9d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-9e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-9f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-9g
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-9h
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
NA ORD-2002-036 Budget Amendment #7
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2002
RES-2002-097 Resolution Providing DCHC TAC with comments regarding the draft recommended financially constrained 2025 Long-range Transportation Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2002
RES-2002-098 Resolution Providing Comments to NCDOT and DCHC TAC Regarding the Draft 2004-2010 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2002
RES-2002-099 Resolution Providing Comments to NCDOT and DCHC TAC Regarding the Draft 2004-2010 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2002
S ORD-2002-037 Telecommunication Tower Ordinance Amendments
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Carey said that he assumed that the Sheriff would be involved. He asked how <br />much time would elapse between phase 1 and phase 2. This would help him determine whether 24,000 <br />or 27,000 square feet is needed. He asked if the existing Sheriff's office had any historical significance. <br />Pam Jones said that there is no historical significance to this building. Regarding the phases, she said <br />that there is na timetable for when to begin phase 2. It depends on how we can maximize phase 1. It <br />will be needs driven and not time driven. <br />Commissioner Carey said that he agreed with Commissioner Halkiotis about the basement not <br />being used as storage. He asked if this was addressed in the CIP. She said that warehouse space is <br />not included in the CIP. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that she would assume that you would not expand the Government <br />Services Center and annex unless you address parking. She said that just because the Sheriff's building <br />is not demolished does not necessarily mean that the Sheriff would stay there. She said that the <br />Sheriff's office could be used far something else if the Sheriff moved. She also wondered where the <br />other functions proposed for an expansion would be housed if we do not expand the Government <br />Services Center and annex. <br />Pam Jones said that the last phase that Freeman White did include an in depth study of traffic <br />analysis and parking. <br />Chair Brown said that the existing space at the courthouse will have to be reconfigured and she <br />asked if this would be a part of the discussion. Pam Jones said that reallocation of space is a possibility <br />and they will talk with the architect. The original plan is to build a connector so there will be some space <br />between the buildings. <br />Pam Jones answered several clarifying questions of the Board. <br />Chair Brown asked if the Board of County Commissioners would continue having meetings at the <br />courthouse, or if some space should be designed to have meetings and build in a televised component. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis said that he is happy in the courtroom. He does not mind looking at the <br />option. Commissioner Jacobs is open to ideas. Commissioner Carey said that he would like to look at <br />the options. <br />Commissioner Carey said that it looks like we are assuming that we need 27,000 square feet, <br />unless it can be pared down somehow. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked about the budget and Pam Jones said that it would probably be about <br />$100 per square foot. <br />Chair Brown asked to include that there be some representation or consideration to have space for <br />Mental Health. <br />Judge Wade Barber said that he appreciated the consideration of this expansion. He is glad <br />someone raised the issue of the utilization of space in the existing courthouse. He said that there is a <br />big lack of public space outside the courtrooms in the existing courthouse. He said that there will be a lot <br />of questions until we take the steps to move along and select the architect. <br />Judge Joe Buckner said that he agreed with Judge Barber and reminded the Board that this will <br />stay in a fluid state. He said that the elected officials have and will continue to work together to use the <br />facilities. He said that this is an issue of what they see and believe is the lack of services that we are <br />providing to people who use the courts. He said that we need to move forward and the County needs to <br />meet the needs of the courts. The County has employees in the courts and they have no control aver <br />the business that is brought to them. He said that this is not about Judges' offices. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked about the functions that have been planned for this facility and if they <br />are adequate. Judge Buckner said that it is the responsibility of the County to provide court facilities, but <br />it is also the County's privilege to decide how the building is going to look. He said that the courthouse is <br />completely inadequate for victims of crime and for people who are under high-stress cases. He thinks <br />that it can be fixed. He is aware of counties that have worked together to provide long term solutions <br />that served the counties well. <br />Clerk of Court Jamie Stanford added that from his perspective it is imperative that he gets his staff <br />back under one roof. He urged the County Commissioners to move forward quickly. <br />Pam Jones said that the judicial group could get information together by the end of January and the <br />Board would appoint committees in January. The selection could be made by the end of June. The <br />funding becomes available July 1St <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.