Browse
Search
Minutes - 20021210
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Minutes - 20021210
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 4:25:38 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:06:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/10/2002
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 12-10-2002
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-5a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-5b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-6a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-8c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-8d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-8e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-8f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-8g
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-8h
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-8i
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-8j
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-8k
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-8l
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-9a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-9b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-9c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-9d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-9e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-9f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-9g
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
Agenda - 12-10-2002-9h
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
NA ORD-2002-036 Budget Amendment #7
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2002
RES-2002-097 Resolution Providing DCHC TAC with comments regarding the draft recommended financially constrained 2025 Long-range Transportation Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2002
RES-2002-098 Resolution Providing Comments to NCDOT and DCHC TAC Regarding the Draft 2004-2010 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2002
RES-2002-099 Resolution Providing Comments to NCDOT and DCHC TAC Regarding the Draft 2004-2010 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2002
S ORD-2002-037 Telecommunication Tower Ordinance Amendments
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
public. He said that he is concerned about how low the levels of service are. He said that we are locking <br />ourselves into the most aggressive levels of service for each one of the levels of schools. He thinks it is <br />remarkable that people come to the budget public hearings and ask the County Commissioners to raise <br />their taxes because they want more money spent on schools. He said that the Chamber is on the right <br />track in asking that the levels of service be raised. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Carey to change <br />the levels of service to 110% for elementary, 115°lo for middle, and 120% for high schools. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that it is true that these levels of service are aggressive (105, 107, <br />and 110}. The staff and the committee discussed this extensively and decided on these levels for the <br />reasons stated by Commissioner Halkiotis. She thinks the Manager has made it clear that we will not <br />bankrupt ourselves on this because the County debt policy will not allow it. <br />UOTE: Aye, 1; Nays, 4 (Commissioners Brown, Carey, Gordon, and Halkiotis} <br />The motion failed. <br />Chair Brown made reference to the letter from the Chamber and said that it seems like there <br />are a lot of contradictions in it, but she understands the intent of it. She said that maybe everyone needs <br />to clearly understand that the Board of County Commissioners has committed $275 million in the last 12 <br />or 13 years to education. There is no lack of commitment on the part of this Board. <br />Jahn Link said that the focus in the CIP will be what should the cost of a new school be, what <br />can the County afford, and how are we comparing the request for new schools here and their capacity to <br />other school systems and other counties in the State and the country. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs to <br />approve the MOU for the Chapel Hill-Carrboro School district, with the addendum as drafted by the <br />County Attorney. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />Geoff Gledhill pointed out that in the addendum to the Chapel Hill-Carrboro MOU there is <br />language about bringing the statistical changes to the other governments for their review and comment. <br />He said that this was not requested by Hillsborough or the Orange County School systems. He said that <br />there should not be this difference in the two memoranda. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that the school system and Hillsborough are still trying to schedule <br />a meeting, presumably in January. There will still be an opportunity for them to be on board at the same <br />time. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve <br />the Manager's recommendation for the MOU for the Orange County School District with the change to <br />the MOU as amended in the Chapel Hill-Carrboro MOU, section 1-d. The Manager's recommendation is <br />as follows: to approve the proposed MOU and the addendum as outlined in the County Attorney's <br />November 27, 2002 letter. It should be noted that there are two separate MOU agreements. One would <br />be effective within the Chapel Hill-Carrboro School District, with parties to the agreement being the <br />County, the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools, and the Towns of Carrboro and Chapel Hill. The other <br />agreement would be effective within the Orange County School District, with the parties being the <br />County, the Orange County Schools, and the Town of Hillsborough. The Manager recommends Option <br />II, which temporarily suspends the adequacy test for the middle school level. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />b. Legal Advertisement for Special Public Hearing on January 21, 2003 <br />The Board considered authorizing the submission for a legal advertisement for a special <br />public hearing to be held January 21, 2003. <br />Craig Benedict said that the approval of the above item sets forth a request for a legal <br />advertisement to hold a special public hearing to discuss the implementing SAPFO. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve <br />the proposed January 21, 2003 Special Public Hearing legal advertisement. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />c. Funding Request -Habitat for Humanity of Orange County, N.C., Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.