Minutes 01-24-2012 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

6. Items Removed From Consent Aqenda o. Unified Development Ordinance Amendment Outline and Schedule for Upcominq Item The Board considered process components and the schedule for a Planning Director initiated item for the February 27, 2012 Quarterly Public Hearing. Commissioner Gordon made reference to her comments and staff responses, as shown below. She said that the scope of this amendment started out as being narrow. She is concerned about the wide range in the scope of this amendment. UDO Amendment Could you explain how Objective LU-1.1 is related to the proposed UDO amendment? This objective refers to coordinating the location of higher intensity/high density residential and non-residential development with, among other things, adequate supporting infrastructure, while avoiding areas with protected natural and cultural resources. This objective refers to coordinating the location of higher intensity/high density residential and non-residential development with, among other things, adequate supporting infrastructure, while avoiding areas with protected natural and cultural resources. Michael Harvey said that the original rationale for choosing this particular item was for the provision of services. He said that the Board could add in the form that the proposed amendment, which was suggested at the November 21St dinner meeting of the Board of County Commissioners and the Planning Board, is supported by the Services and Community Facilities Goal of the Comprehensive Plan as well as objective PSP-7 through PS-9, all dealing with the management and deliberation of local emergency services, economic development and communication efforts. A motion was made by Commissioner Yuhasz, seconded by Commissioner McKee to approve the Amendment Outline and direct staff to proceed accordingly. VOTE: Ayes, 6; No, 1 (Commissioner Gordon) r_ Correction to Ordinance 2011-036—Class II Kennels/Ridina Stables The Board considered adopting a revised Ordinance amending the UDO to correct a staff error. Commissioner Gordon said that this has been presented by staff as a correction. She pulled it to vote against it because she does not agree with the ordinance the way it is worded. Following are her comments and staff responses: C/ass ll Kennels P/ease clarify the meaning of the text shown in red. It appears to mean that all of this text in red is to be changed, in addition to what was changed on October 18, 2011. A/so, please provide a copy of the following attachment for the October 18 meeting, along with any other material needed to show what the BOCC approved on October 18. Attachment 5— UDO Ordinance Amendment—ltem 7-c on the October 18, 2011 BOCC Agenda. With respect to kennels, staff is asking the BOCC to readopt a corrected ordinance amendment, which is why all changed text is denoted in RED.