Browse
Search
Minutes - 20021106
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Minutes - 20021106
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2017 3:29:31 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:05:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/6/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 11-06-2002 - Agenda
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 11-06-2002
Agenda - 11-06-2002 - 5a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 11-06-2002
Agenda - 11-06-2002 - 5b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 11-06-2002
Agenda - 11-06-2002 - 5c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 11-06-2002
Agenda - 11-06-2002 - 5d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 11-06-2002
Agenda - 11-06-2002 - 5e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 11-06-2002
Agenda - 11-06-2002 - 6a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 11-06-2002
Agenda - 11-06-2002 - 8a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 11-06-2002
Agenda - 11-06-2002 - 8b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 11-06-2002
Agenda - 11-06-2002 - 8c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 11-06-2002
Agenda - 11-06-2002 - 8d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 11-06-2002
Agenda - 11-06-2002 - 8e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 11-06-2002
Agenda - 11-06-2002 - 8g
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 11-06-2002
Agenda - 11-06-2002 - 9a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 11-06-2002
Agenda - 11-06-2002 - 9c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 11-06-2002
Agenda - 11-06-2002 - 9d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 11-06-2002
Agenda - 11-06-2002 - 9e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 11-06-2002
Agenda - 11-06-2002 - 9f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 11-06-2002
Agenda - 11-06-2002 - 9g
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 11-06-2002
P ORD-2002-030 Telecommunications Tower Ordinance Amendments
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Board received a report on the various issues raised at the August 20, <br /> 2002 BOCC meeting concerning prior approval of the Tuscany Ridge Preliminary <br /> Subdivision. <br /> Craig Benedict gave the overview of this item. Based on community input, <br /> this subdivision was brought back to the County Commissioners to hear from the general <br /> public in August. Based on the comments, there were a variety of things that the staff <br /> researched. He referred to page 8 for the issues that were brought forward. <br /> Item 1 — someone brought up a concern about the stream located on the <br /> eastern boundary of the project, near the stub out. This is in the NE corner of the <br /> property. The stream is located on part of a lot that does not have any septic system. It <br /> is not where the road extension was planned. It can be protected and a buffer easement <br /> would be put around the spring. <br /> Item 2 —Arthur Minnis Road paving - The discussion was about when the <br /> road was approved to be paved for an 800-foot section and when right-of-way was <br /> acquired. There are additional letters from the NCDOT Professional Engineer. The <br /> letter basically said that the 800-foot section of road had right-of-way acquired since <br /> 1973. Since 1973, on a repeated basis, it has come back up for inclusion in a roadway- <br /> paving program. They have been unable to acquire all of the right-of-way. <br /> Item 3— drainage and sedimentation control - This was brought up by <br /> Commissioner Brown and some other residents. It is on a knoll and there is not a lot of <br /> water that passes through this area. A lot of the flow is in a NE direction and there will <br /> be appropriate management practices used to dissipate water velocities. <br /> Items 4 and 5 —water resources to handle 22 additional wells in this area - <br /> There is an attached letter from Environmental Health Director Ron Holdway that <br /> discusses the situations that occur in this area and in other areas of the County. He said <br /> that if wells cannot be tapped then you couldn't put a lot there. The staff believes that <br /> the wells are feasible. <br /> Item 6 -Other environmental features. There was a concern about the <br /> amount of open space in the rural buffer regulations. There are no houses that will be <br /> on the road. The open space is provided with a connection and some trails. <br /> Item 7 - Notification process for major subdivisions - On November 25`h, they <br /> will be proposing to change the notification process for major subdivisions. They will <br /> also be addressing some new regulations for major subdivisions. <br /> Item 8— Financial Impact analysis —the staff does use a template and it is <br /> not the basis of approval or denial of a development. The fiscal impact analysis is not <br /> intended to be a regulatory tool. <br /> Item 9— having signs directly on the property—This will be a suggestion with <br /> the new ordinance to post the property and let all residents know about what is occurring <br /> in the area. <br /> The staff believes that this project did go through the proper process and that <br /> it was a reasonable recommendation to approve it. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said that she wanted to give ample time for the <br /> Tuscany Ridge neighbors to comment, but she would like to address other items on the <br /> agenda because she will ask for adjournment at 10:30 p.m. <br /> Chair Jacobs said that after the five people speak, then the Board could <br /> address the legal advertisement for the November 25`h quarterly public hearing. <br /> Commissioner Halkiotis asked Chair Jacobs to explain that there was no <br /> secret meeting with DOT. Chair Jacobs said that the Chair and the Vice-Chair have <br /> been meeting at regular intervals with representatives of the DOT to share information <br /> and ask questions. They report back to the Board what they find. At their last meeting, <br /> they said that they would go to DOT and ask them what was the genesis of this paving <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.