Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-13-2012 - 8e
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 03-13-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 03-13-2012 - 8e
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2015 1:41:36 PM
Creation date
3/9/2012 3:36:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/13/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8e
Document Relationships
Minutes 03-13-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. <br />Membership Data <br />CHCCS total increase from the previous year <br />168 Elementary School <br />31 Middle School <br />74 High School <br />OCS total increase from the previous year: <br />63 Elementary School <br />6 Middle School <br />61 High School <br />( ) denotes decrease <br />4. Capacity Data <br />There were no changes to school capacities this year for Orange County Schools or <br />Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools. <br />5. Capacity Issues <br />SAPFO vs. DPI <br />The SAPFO is a local ordinance, independent of State Department of Public Instruction <br />(DPI) projections and rules regarding class size. The SAPFO, for instance, does not <br />count temporary modular classrooms as fulfilling the capacity level of service outlined in <br />the SAPFO interlocal Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). The MOU requires `bricks <br />and mortar' instead of temporary facilities and also requires its own set of future student <br />projections to identify long-term capital school construction needs. However, the County <br />did phase in the smaller class size in previous years that decreased capacity. Decisions <br />will have to be made if new discussions at the state level create any class size changes <br />that should or should not be reflected in the County's SAPFO. <br />CHCCS does not exceed the adopted levels of service established in the SAPFO at this <br />time. However, projections show potential needs at the elementary, middle, and high <br />school levels within the 10-year planning period. Projected needs are noted below. <br />OCS does not exceed the adopted levels of service established in the SAPFO at this <br />time. However, projections show potential needs at the elementary school level within <br />the 10-year planning period. Projected needs are noted below. <br />6. Student Projection Analysis <br />Student membership projections show an increase at all levels in both school systems, <br />except for a slight drop in 2018-2019 at the high school level for OCS. The projections <br />are shown on pages 35-36 of the report. <br />7. Orange County Schools Systems - Capital Investment Plan (CIP) Needs Analysis <br />CHCCS <br />Projected needs: <br />New Elementary #11 2012-2013 (projected overage of 66 students; 106.3% LOS) <br />New Middle School #5 2017-2018 (projected overage of 30 students; 108.1 % LOS) <br />High School 2020-2021 (projected overage of 43 students; 111.1 % LOS) <br />273 students <br />130 students <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.