Orange County NC Website
i <br /> 18 <br /> 1 <br /> 2 6. The Fire Departments' Strategic Plan. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 The Board of County Commissioners requested a timeline for the Emergency Services <br /> 5 Workgroup. There are many unknowns regarding the direction of the Workgroup, but the <br /> 6 charge and the timeline will be the first items discussed by the Emergency Services Workgroup <br /> 7 and will report back to the Board on February 7, 2012. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 FINANCIAL IMPACT: The approval of the Charge for this Workgroup will have no financial <br /> 10 impact on the County. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board approve the proposed <br /> 13 Charge for the Emergency Services Workgroup, and give direction to staff as to changes in the <br /> 14 Charge. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Commissioner Jacobs said that it is important to note that one of the things that the <br /> 18 County is looking at for dealing with system improvements for EMS ambulance response times <br /> 19 is meaningful and analytical data. He suggested adding this to item #3. <br /> 20 Chair Pelissier suggested making this a separate item —the data elements. <br /> 21 Commissioner Foushee said that she does not disagree with Chair Pelissier but the <br /> 22 point that Commissioner Jacobs made makes it easier for the group to consider that data within <br /> 23 the scope of the charge. She would not want to see it separated. She would like to see#3 <br /> 24 reworded such that it includes discussion and review of analytical data as it relates to response <br /> 25 times. <br /> 26 Chair Pelissier agreed. <br /> 27 A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Yuhasz to <br /> 28 approve the proposed Charge for the Emergency Services Workgroup, and give direction to <br /> 29 staff as to changes in the Charge; with the inclusion of listing Michael Talbert as facilitator of the <br /> 30 work group and adding the recommendation for meaningful data to be included in item#3. <br /> 31 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 32 <br /> 33 c. Next Steps: Northern Human Services Center <br /> 34 The Board considered information about community efforts regarding the disposition of <br /> 35 the Northern Human Services Center; and to provide direction to staff on next steps. <br /> 36 Asset Management Director Pam Jones and Department of Environment, Agriculture, <br /> 37 Parks and Recreation (DEAPR) Director David Stancil made a PowerPoint presentation. <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Northern Human Services Center Next Steps <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Tonight's Purpose: <br /> 42 - Review status of project discussions <br /> 43 - Review ideas from informal small group <br /> 44 - Consider two concepts or"options" as basis for future input <br /> 45 - Review and approve public input process, including community meetings <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Background: <br /> 48 - Existing Building constructed 1950, 1957 (addition) <br /> 49 - Building costs over$100,000/year to maintain, limited usage <br /> 50 - CIP includes funds in FY 2012/13 to remove structure <br />