Agenda - 03-13-2012 - 5a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

11 1 2 6. Items Removed From Consent Agenda 3 o. Unified Development Ordinance Amendment Outline and Schedule for 4 Upcoming Item 5 The Board considered process components and the schedule for a Planning Director 6 initiated item for the February 27, 2012 Quarterly Public Hearing. 7 Commissioner Gordon made reference to her comments and staff responses, as 8 shown below. She said that the scope of this amendment started out as being narrow. She is 9 concerned about the wide range in the scope of this amendment. 10 11 LIDO Amendment 12 Could you explain how Objective LU-1.1 is related to the proposed LIDO amendment? 13 This objective refers to coordinating the location of higher intensity/high density residential and 14 non-residential development with, among other things, adequate supporting infrastructure, while 15 avoiding areas with protected natural and cultural resources. 16 17 This objective refers to coordinating the location of higher intensity/high density 18 residential and non-residential development with, among other things, adequate 19 supporting infrastructure, while avoiding areas with protected natural and cultural 20 resources. 21 22 Michael Harvey said that the original rationale for choosing this particular item was for 23 the provision of services. He said that the Board could add in the form that the proposed 24 amendment, which was suggested at the November 21St dinner meeting of the Board of County 25 Commissioners and the Planning Board, is supported by the Services and Community Facilities 26 Goal of the Comprehensive Plan as well as objective PSP-7 through PS-9, all dealing with the 27 management and deliberation of local emergency services, economic development and 28 communication efforts. 29 A motion was made by Commissioner Yuhasz, seconded by Commissioner McKee to 30 approve the Amendment Outline and direct staff to proceed accordingly. 31 VOTE: Ayes, 6; No, 1 (Commissioner Gordon) 32 33 r. Correction to Ordinance 2011-036—Class II Kennels/Riding Stables 34 The Board considered adopting a revised Ordinance amending the UDO to correct a 35 staff error. 36 Commissioner Gordon said that this has been presented by staff as a correction. She 37 pulled it to vote against it because she does not agree with the ordinance the way it is worded. 38 Following are her comments and staff responses: 39 40 Class II Kennels 41 Please clarify the meaning of the text shown in red. It appears to mean that all of this 42 text in red is to be changed, in addition to what was changed on October 18, 2011. 43 Also, please provide a copy of the following attachment for the October 18 meeting, 44 along with any other material needed to show what the BOCC approved on October 18. 45 Attachment 5— LIDO Ordinance Amendment—Item 7-c on the October 18, 2011 BOCC 46 Agenda. 47 48 With respect to kennels, staff is asking the BOCC to readopt a corrected 49 ordinance amendment, which is why all changed text is denoted in RED.