Browse
Search
Minutes - 20021009
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Minutes - 20021009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2017 12:16:44 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:05:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/9/2002
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 10-09-2002 - Agenda - Public Hearing
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 10-09-2002
Agenda - 10-09-2002 - Agenda - Work Session
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 10-09-2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
village type developments. One advantage of this is that there can be clusters of dense development so <br /> that the environmentally sensitive areas can be preserved. She described some areas on a map. She <br /> pointed out prime and secondary conservation areas to be protected. She asked where else in the <br /> Northern Transition area could you have property that is more environmentally sensitive than this. She <br /> said that this is precisely the property that village mixed use zoning is designed to protect, by putting <br /> high-density development someplace else. She said that the importance of the stream buffers is <br /> enormous. She said that the developers will tell you that their storm water engineering systems will take <br /> care of all problems. She referred to recent history and said that we should be skeptical. She reminded <br /> the Board that the developers and the Town of Carrboro would not be responsible for the engineered <br /> solutions after they are built. The engineered solutions are not self-sustaining and the maintenance is <br /> the responsibility of the homeowner's association. She would hate to trust Bolin Creek to such a group. <br /> She asked the Board to please consider wisely where village mixed use zoning should go. If you mess <br /> up Bolin Creek with Winmore, it cannot be un-built. <br /> Rick Faith distributed a handout. He lives near Homestead and Rogers Roads in the Northern <br /> Transition Area. He asked if Winmore was really the village that Carrboro wants. He also asked if <br /> Winmore would be the village that Carrboro could be proud of in the years to come. He believes the <br /> answer to both of these questions is no based on density, walkability, and commercial viability. He said <br /> that downtown Carrboro is significantly less dense than what is planned for Winmore. He pointed out <br /> some places on a map. He said that the lot sizes were smaller than the requirement for Habitat for <br /> Humanity homes. He said that one rule of thumb for walkability is that people are willing to walk % mile. <br /> He said that there are not many people living within a % mile walking distance of Winmore's business <br /> area, and there are not many businesses within that % mile. He said that the people will have to drive a <br /> lot. He showed the flood plain of Bolin Creek. He strongly feels that Winmore will not fulfill the dreams of <br /> our community for a new village. It will not have the feel or the walkability of Carrboro or of Southern <br /> Village, and it possesses a difficult tradeoff between commercial viability and environmental <br /> responsibility. He urged the boards to reject Winmore at this time and wait for a proposal for a village <br /> that will meet expectations. <br /> Mark Gill is a resident of the Northern Transition area. He spoke about the storm water runoff of <br /> the proposed Winmore project. He gave a PowerPoint presentation. He spoke about heavy metal <br /> pollutants and said that there would be a heavy metal depository right next to Bolin Creek with lead, <br /> copper, zinc, and cadmium. <br /> Rich Kaufman lives in the Northern Transition area. He said that he sat beside someone on a <br /> plane who is the wife of someone who is on the board of directors of a large university. He spoke to her <br /> about this situation and she said that he was wasting his time and that the public meetings were only for <br /> show and that the agreements have already been made behind closed doors between the developer, the <br /> city, and the university. He hopes she is wrong. He went over a few facts. He said that the Northern <br /> Transition zone is in a water crisis. The schools in the Northern Transition zone are over capacity. He <br /> cannot understand why we are putting high density next to Bolin Creek. The university is five miles from <br /> the proposed high-density area of Winmore 1 and 2. He said that no one would be walking this far to the <br /> university. He said that the politicians in Carrboro were willing participants in the joint planning <br /> agreement. He said that these same politicians broke the agreement of joint planning and this is a <br /> breach of public trust. He said that by annexation, you have undermined the longstanding joint planning <br /> agreement and have rendered the Board of County Commissioners irrelevant in this process. He said <br /> that this is bad planning, bad politics, and a bad example for the community. He said that in order to <br /> protect the environment and the children (over capacity schools) we must maintain low-density zoning. <br /> Stephanie London is a resident of Northern Transition area. She said that zoning decisions are <br /> among those that most directly affect the quality of local residents' lives. It affects property taxes, road <br /> and school crowding, environmental issues, water supply, the value of property, etc. She said that the <br /> residents in Highlands and Camden are outside of both Carrboro and Chapel Hill. They do not get to vote <br /> for elected officials of either town. They do get to vote for the Board of County Commissioners. She <br /> urged the towns to keep the Board of County Commissioners in the loop for planning decisions for <br /> Winmore, including the right to vote on zoning. She said that Alderman Mike Dorosin recently disputed <br /> the notion that people we can vote for may be more interested in our concerns than the Board of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.