Browse
Search
Minutes - 20021009
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Minutes - 20021009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2017 12:16:44 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:05:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/9/2002
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 10-09-2002 - Agenda - Public Hearing
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 10-09-2002
Agenda - 10-09-2002 - Agenda - Work Session
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 10-09-2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The consumers have wanted a process outside of this. This mega—coordination group <br /> (that Commissioner Brown has proposed) could be under or over mental health. It is a <br /> good idea to not duplicate the coordination of services. He made reference to the <br /> complaints of the UNC Hospital emergency room where people are coming in for <br /> medication checks because their prescriptions have run out and they cannot get in to <br /> see a psychiatrist and they show up in the emergency room. This could be solved with a <br /> contract. <br /> Commissioner Gordon asked how Tom Maynard would imagine this would all <br /> work. She said that as she understands it, right now the State provides certain services <br /> through institutions and then the county provides services. The county both manages <br /> and provides the services. The change is that some of the beds at the State level are <br /> going to be eliminated and then at the county level, there is going to be a separation <br /> between the management and the delivery of services. She asked about the economy <br /> of scale. She said that it looks like the providers will remain and that OPC is going to <br /> have to divest itself of some of its provision of services. She said that the question that <br /> was brought up last night is if you have more of these smaller entities, then OPC will <br /> lose its economy of scale. <br /> Tom Maynard agreed with Commissioner Gordon. He is worried about economy <br /> of scale also. He thinks in most cases we can divest effectively, but they are worried <br /> about the possible duplication of infrastructure at a lower level. They have thought about <br /> how to make available a service organization function where the LME might extend to <br /> non-profits the services that they might need. <br /> Commissioner Gordon asked if there was a certain amount of money that the <br /> public sector will pay to the non-profits. Another question is where everyone is going to <br /> live with reduced beds at the State level. <br /> Tom Maynard said that the answer is not to create group homes for everybody <br /> coming out of an institution. It is dreadful to put them in rest homes. The only answer is <br /> to have them go to independent living situations with the appropriate resources. He said <br /> that the kind of support that the mentally ill need typically varies from day to day. When <br /> needed, there can be crisis beds available. There must be flexible services, but you <br /> have to be able to pay for it. Sometimes there can be roommates, but typically finances <br /> come up short. If there is a strong core of support services, then there can be lots of <br /> people in relatively light duty living situations without around the clock support. You <br /> have to be able to respond to emergencies immediately, and if patients know that, then <br /> their confidence increases. <br /> Commissioner Gordon asked how much it would cost to put the people in the <br /> new situation and if it would cost more than now and if the services would be better, the <br /> same, or worse. Tom Maynard said that the base level of funding does not change with <br /> the reform. He referred to a handout and how much money we can free up with this new <br /> model of care. There are two local things they can control. One is to shift non-priority <br /> population savings to priority. If they were to not serve those who had low priority <br /> services and only focus on high priority services, they could free up as much as a million <br /> dollars. He does not recommend doing this. He thinks that they can free up a million <br /> dollars by redirecting some of the priority population money and by recycling the <br /> services going to non-priority populations. He said that the non-priority populations are <br /> very small and most of the people they are serving are in very serious need. Regarding <br /> where they would go for the money to serve those in the institutions, he said that it would <br /> not solve the problem by transferring money from the institutions. He said that there <br /> should be bridge money for the transition. There may not be enough money from the <br /> institutions to cover the need and the only possible solution to the problem is to change <br /> the Medicaid plan. The State has said that they would create a new rewrite of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.