Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1/12/2012 <br /> Transit Recommendations <br /> • Alignment C-1 and C-2 <br /> 1 Short Term are still viable <br /> Expand local -E4EN6 alternatives <br /> regional connections <br /> Roadway designs reflect <br /> corridor C-1 alignment;however, <br /> C-2 alignment will work <br /> with minor design <br /> r changes <br /> p' (1 Long Te I Additional traffic analysis <br /> �:• • • • • _• , ti may be needed if C-2 is <br /> I selected as preferred <br /> 1 transit generators alignment <br /> r Increased bus service north of •rridor t� <br /> region_RT connects corridor with Neither the C-1 or C-2 <br /> Flex route shuttle service for • density area alignment is in direct <br /> conflict with NC 54 <br /> recommendations <br /> Bicycle & I <br /> Pedestrian <br /> Roadway 1 1 1 <br /> Recommendations <br /> • Cohesive,connected Complete collector street <br /> network connections <br /> • On-road and off-road • Widen NC 54 to six lanes <br /> facilities f4` • Improve capacity through <br /> • Pedestrian emphasis superstreet design and <br /> areas _ grade separation <br /> • Intersection at grade , • Address critical issues at ' <br /> and grade-separated ° 1-40 interchange r" <br /> crossing treatments =. Modify US 15-501 <br /> • Pedestrian signals -- _ interchanges+ <br /> 3 <br />