Browse
Search
Minutes - 20020820
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Minutes - 20020820
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2017 3:07:53 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:03:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/20/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
2002 NS Housing - Housing Rehabilitation Contract Awards
(Superseded by)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2000's\2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - Agenda
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 5a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 5b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 5c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 6a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 6b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 6c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 8b1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 8b2
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 8c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 8d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 8e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 8f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 8g
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 8h
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 8i
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 8j
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 8k
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 8l
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 8m
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 8n
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 8o
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 8p
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 8q
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 8r
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 8s
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 8t
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 9a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 9b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 9c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 9d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 08-20-2002
NA ORD-2002-022 Budget Amendment #1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2002
RES-2002-060 Resolution Endorsing Establishment of Rural Planning Organization
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WHEREAS, Community Health Centers like those operated by Piedmont Health Services promote 100% <br /> access and zero health disparities to help achieve primary health care for all people; <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orange County Board of Commissioners do hereby <br /> proclaim the week of August 18 through 24, 2002 as "Health Center Week" in Orange County and urge <br /> all citizens to recognize the important contributions of the health centers operated by Piedmont Health <br /> Services, Inc. to the improvement of the general quality of life of the residents and citizens of Orange <br /> County. <br /> This, the 20`h day of August 2002. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS <br /> a. Tuscany Ridge Preliminary Subdivision <br /> The Board received a special report on issues and answers concerning the approved <br /> Tuscany Ridge subdivision. <br /> Chair Jacobs said that, despite what it said in one of the documents received from a citizen, <br /> the Board does want to listen. He said that the Board agrees with Commissioner Gordon in that it was a <br /> surprise to the Board that our regulations did not include notification to people in the rural buffer as they <br /> do to people elsewhere in Orange County. He said that the Board regrets that this was an oversight on <br /> the part of Orange County government for almost 20 years. He said that in the future, residents would <br /> be notified about developments. He said that this is not a public hearing. He asked that residents <br /> signed up to speak to address the concerns that have not adequately been addressed by the staff or by <br /> the County government so that it can be referred to the staff to get some answers. He asked the citizens <br /> to keep comments to three minutes. <br /> Commissioner Brown said that this is being brought up because of the joint planning <br /> agreement with Chapel Hill and Carrboro that created the rural buffer. This is an inter-local agreement <br /> with our municipalities and usually we do not tamper with this document. She asked Craig Benedict to <br /> describe the inter-local agreement to the public and explain the rural buffer. She personally would not <br /> like to see the inter-local agreement tampered with because there was a lot of opposition to it by <br /> developers who wanted to break the rural buffer agreement and extend water and sewer. Her position <br /> has always been to have a rural buffer and to maintain it so that Chapel Hill and Carrboro do not grow <br /> and create a huge urban area all the way to Hillsborough. She thinks it is very nice to see citizens that <br /> enjoy the rural buffer and feel a sense of what it is all about. <br /> Planning Director Craig Benedict spoke on the joint planning agreement and how this project <br /> fits in. The joint planning agreement was adopted in 1987. It set an area together of about 48,000 acres <br /> on the north and west side of Chapel Hill and Carrboro. It was one of the first in North Carolina to set <br /> some urban growth boundaries. Also, the rural buffer set some density standards. Only one lot per two <br /> acres is allowed in the rural buffer. Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and Orange County were partners in this <br /> agreement. He said that he is not suggesting major changes to the agreement, but we do need to look <br /> at it and improve it in some ways. He referred to a hand out with about nine issues, which he will <br /> address later. He went on to give a history of the Tuscany Ridge project. In November 2001 a concept <br /> plan was submitted for 22 lots on 55 acres. It was processed by staff for about five months and in March <br /> 2002 it was brought to the Planning Board. The concept plan was approved unanimously by the <br /> Planning Board. It then moved to the preliminary plan stage. On June 6`h the Planning Board <br /> unanimously approved the subdivision because it met all conditions of the code. The subdivision was <br /> brought to the Board of County Commissioners on June 27`h. It was reviewed and approved by the <br /> Board of County Commissioners. He described how some sections of the code have neighbor <br /> notification and other sections of the code do not. Major subdivisions within the rural buffer do not <br /> require neighborhood notification. He said he could informally notify neighbors about a subdivision but <br /> that it is not a part of the code. He does agree that similar notification requirements throughout the <br /> County would be fair and equitable. He said that we could proceed with a rule change to the land <br /> development code in the subdivision process and make neighborhood notification a requirement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.