Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 7a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 7a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2015 2:46:49 PM
Creation date
2/17/2012 2:26:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/21/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-21-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
ORD-2012-007 An Ordinance Amending the Orange County Zoning Atlas – Carolina Friends Schools
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-008 (not approved) An Ord Denying an Amendment Request to the Orange County Zoning Atlas
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
34 <br />constraints. We also discussed operational matters such as seasonal use, no field <br />lighting, no rental of the field to others, etc. The Preyers made no specific request for any <br />design changes during the meeting. They agreed to consider the various issues and get <br />back to me with any specific requests. <br />3.The Preyers replied to me on Dec. 12, 2011 with a request to: <br />• Add a planted berm between the field and the property line, <br />• Move any encroaching portion of the existing trail off their property, <br />• Shift the field so that the infield (but not necessarily the outfield) is further away <br />from property line. <br />4.I sent the Preyers a revised drawing on Dec. 17, 2011 that showed a new layout for the <br />field and parking area that: <br />• Successfully complied with each request listed above, and <br />• Also shifted the parking area further away from property line. <br />S.On J anuary 2, 2012, the Preyers requested a meeting on the following day to discuss the <br />matter further. <br />6.CFS staff and I met with the Preyers at their office on Jan. 3, 2012 as requested. In the <br />meeting: <br />• They asked us again if we could move the field to another area of <br />the property. We explained again, in more detail, the various <br />locations that had been considered and why each of the other areas <br />could not properly accommodate the field. <br />• They asked if we could move the parking area to another location. <br />We explained that the purpose of the parking area is to serve the <br />users of the field, and more specifically to a11ow vehicular access <br />(including emergency vehicle access) to the infield and spectator <br />areas; therefore there is no other reasonable place to put it. <br />• I further explained that the field will be graded to an elevation that <br />is a few feet lower than the natural ground elevation near the <br />property line, and the berm will be placed on the top of the resulting <br />slope. This condition will enhance the positive effect of the berm <br />and the evergreen landscaping on top of the berm, by creating more <br />vertical separation between the activity on the field and the adjacent <br />property. <br />• They seemed to reluctantly accept our explanations and stated that <br />it appears that we "have done all that we can do". <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.