Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 7a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 7a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2015 2:46:49 PM
Creation date
2/17/2012 2:26:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/21/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-21-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
ORD-2012-007 An Ordinance Amending the Orange County Zoning Atlas – Carolina Friends Schools
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-008 (not approved) An Ord Denying an Amendment Request to the Orange County Zoning Atlas
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br />109 Michael Harvey: Again, the Pianning Board has the ability to make a motion to affirm staff recommended findings <br />110 beginning on page 24 through page 49 but the Planning Board will have to make motions to make findings to answer <br />111 compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) a, 5.3.2 (A) (2) b, 5.3.2 (A) (2) c. <br />112 <br />113 MOTION: Alan Campbell made a motion to affirm staff's recommendations on page 24 through page 49, items 1 <br />114 through 6. Specific standards for the submission of Conditional Use Application in Section 2.9.1 of the UDO as <br />115 corrected. Seconded by Lisa Stuckey. <br />116 VorE: Unanimous <br />117 <br />118 Brian Crawford: Item number 2 will be page 19. <br />119 <br />120 MOTION: Alan Campbell made a motion to approve based on evidence at the hearing and other evidence in the <br />121 record that we make the following findings, that in accordance with Section 5.3.2(A) (2) a; 5.3.2(A) (2) b; 5.3.2(A) (2) <br />122 c There was no evidence at the public hearing or submitted in writing that the Planning Boarcl indicated that Friends <br />123 School had not met their burden.. Seconded by Larry Wright <br />124 VoTe: Unanimous <br />125 <br />126 Mark Marcoplos: I would like to add that Friends School has always been a respected institution in the community <br />127 and I have known a lot of kids that have graduated there. I was impressed at the thoughtfulness of the design, <br />128 energy efficiency plans for the buildings and the whole way they have interacted with the people involved. <br />129 <br />130 Michael Harvey: Can I make a request that the motion be amended to indicate there was no evidence at the public <br />131 hearing or submitted in writing that the Planning Board indicated that Friends School had not met their burden. <br />132 <br />133 Alan Campbell: I accept that fiendly amendment. <br />134 <br />135 Michael Harvey: The Planning Board needs to make a motion to recommend the twelve conditions on page 51. <br />136 <br />137 MOTION: Alan Campbell made a motion to accept the conditions proposed by the Planning Board which the applicant <br />138 has accepted in writing as described on page 51. Seconded by Larry Wright. <br />139 VoTE: Unanimous <br />140 <br />141 <br />142 <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.