Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 7a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 7a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2015 2:46:49 PM
Creation date
2/17/2012 2:26:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/21/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-21-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
ORD-2012-007 An Ordinance Amending the Orange County Zoning Atlas – Carolina Friends Schools
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-008 (not approved) An Ord Denying an Amendment Request to the Orange County Zoning Atlas
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 <br />1 Tony Whitaker: Regarding food waste, the kids generally bring their lunches. I do suppose <br />2 that there is some waste from that. The school is very good about segregating all kinds of <br />3 waste and very receptive to hearing about better ways to separate waste and collect. <br />4 Composting is an active part of some of the things that go on campus. Those are in the <br />5 operational protocols of the program already. <br />6 Commissioner Jacobs: This memorandum that we got thaYs kind of separate for solid waste <br />7 disposal and management practices, it may just be picking at words, but some of the <br />8 requirements where it says, "recycle a scrap as an aggregate producer," sometimes it says, "if <br />9 practical" and other times it says, "as practical." I would think "as practical° denotes more of a <br />10 commitment to do it than "if practical." <br />11 Tony Whitaker: I agree with you. I think the intent is as practical in every case. As the one <br />12 who wrote those words, I don't believe I made such a fine point of distinction at the time of <br />13 writing, but I do understand that as you speak of it, and I agree. The point is that certain things <br />14 are practical and certain things are not. They'll become manifest in the moment or at the time. <br />15 Sometimes there is a market for some kinds of material and sometimes there's not, depending <br />16 on economic cycles. Those things can be sorted through with another solid waste management <br />17 plan at the time of site plan approval for each facet of the work. Your point is well taken. <br />18 Commissioner Jacobs: So it will be reflected somewhere in the future. <br />19 Tony Whitaker: Yes. And to the current standards at that time. <br />20 Commissioner Jacobs: My last point, it is not really the Friends School's problem, but it is <br />21 more of the County's problem. <br />22 It must be already 15 years since Piney Mountain had its system failure. Piney Mountain is a <br />23 subdivision not far from the Friends School that had a system that was supposed to be cutting <br />24 edge, and in fact it didn't work. It was governed by the same entity that is now being designated <br />25 to administer this system. <br />26 We spent a number of years trying to come up with a mechanism to prevent reliance on DWQ to <br />27 have the sole authority over regulating these kinds of systems in Orange County because it was <br />28 such a mess to have to deal with when the Piney Mountain system failed, and Mr. Whitaker is <br />29 nodding his head, he remembers. We had to come up with a special way to get water and <br />30 sewer from Durham into the rural buffer. <br />31 I don't know really that there's anything to say about this project other than I would like at least <br />32 to put in the record the possibility that Environmental Health staff look at the possibility of adding <br />33 an inspection per year beyond what the state requires so that there's some local oversight of the <br />34 system. Because also what happened was the state was not following through on doing the <br />35 number of inspections of the system, so they didn't even notice very quickly that it had failed. <br />36 Of course the state has been cutting staff for these kinds of functions. I don't know that it's <br />37 necessarily a big issue for you because you're already so far into the pipeline and to bring up <br />38 now that there's a more global issue for the County is not really fair. I do think iYs a more global <br />39 issue for the County, especially if we ever want to do anything more creative in rural areas <br />40 about having any other kind of system other than a well and septic tank. I would at least like to <br />41 have Environmental Health look at whether or not there's a way to bolster the state's inspection. <br />42 I don't know that it would be anything but redundant, but it might prevent something like what we <br />43 had to go through before. <br />44 <br />45 Commissioner McKee: Going back to the issue of the ball field. I heard mention of moving <br />46 the ball field to the east to take into account the adjacent property owners' concerns. If I might <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.