Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 7a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 7a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2015 2:46:49 PM
Creation date
2/17/2012 2:26:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/21/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-21-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
ORD-2012-007 An Ordinance Amending the Orange County Zoning Atlas – Carolina Friends Schools
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-008 (not approved) An Ord Denying an Amendment Request to the Orange County Zoning Atlas
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ <br />1 condition is less dense than the existing condition. I will mention something that you've heard <br />2 already that came up today - a concern expressed by the adjacent property owner. On this <br />3 slide, that property is in this area immediately west of the proposed baseball field. The concern, <br />4 as we understand it - and we've had some conversation today and will have continuing <br />5 conversation - the concern is regarding the proximity of the ball field to the property line. So we <br />6 have looked at this issue today and do believe that there is an opportunity to take the ball field <br />7 and to move it to the right, or in this case, to the east to provide more separation between the <br />8 ball field and the elements of the ball field like the batting cage and the dugout as a separation <br />9 of the ball field to the property owner. So we believe there is that opportunity to work with this <br />10 property owner to satisfy that concern. We eagerly embrace that opportunity. In the next few <br />11 weeks before the Planning Board meeting in January we expect to have those issues resolved <br />12 and be able to report back. Thank you. <br />13 I'll turn it back over to Joe Marian, who has a few concluding remarks. <br />14 Joe Marian: I think Michael did introduce all of the written documents that have been supplied <br />15 so far, but we would ask that the materials from the PowerPoint that you have as well as the <br />16 testimony that has occurred or may yet occur be entered into the official record so that we have <br />17 met those requirements. In closing, the only thing I will say is a little on a personal note. Both <br />18 of my children went to Carolina Friends School and both went for 12 years. One is out of <br />19 college and one is almost out of college. So I am here as a Friends School parent as well. I <br />20 believe in their mission, and I believe in their results, and I believe that this expansion such as it <br />21 is, even though it reduces density, is a wonderful opportunity for a wonderful school. So we <br />22 appreciate your attention and I think we stand ready to answer questions from any source. <br />23 <br />24 Larry Wright: Commissioners, are there any comments? Board members? <br />25 Mark Marcoplos: I'm curious about the baseball fields and the lights. <br />26 Michael Harvey: As I have been informed and as I have testified to and as Mr. Whitaker has <br />27 testified to, there are no proposals to erect outdoor sports field lights around the baseball field or <br />28 any of the other athletic fields. I would consider that, if this is approved, a modification so that <br />29 Carolina Friends School, if they ever wanted to erect such lights, they would have to come back <br />30 before the Board and seek approval for those lights. As of right now, no, and there's also no <br />31 plans for amplified PA system or any other similar announcement system around the ball field. <br />32 <br />33 Johnny Randall: I noticed in the information provided there were a number of what could be <br />34 construed as invasive plant species on the site and there was some intention of removing these <br />35 to the best extent possible. I wanted to contribute some information to the applicant concerning <br />36 the property removal of such species (Mr. Randall handed the applicant a brochure). I'm <br />37 familiar with a number of these plant species, and sooner or later, some of these will take over <br />38 the whole site. So perhaps eliminating these could become a service leaming project for the <br />39 local students. <br />40 Andrea Rohrbacher: With respect to the footbridge to the performing arts center, are there <br />41 adequate safety measures in place for an emergency evacuation? <br />42 Tony Whitaker: Yes. The reason that we have the second entrance from Mt. Sinai Road is to <br />43 provide that emergency/secondary access to the performing arts center in case something is <br />44 needed on that side of the creek and emergency vehicles cannot otherwise get across the <br />45 stream. That driveway will be 20 feet wide; it will meet fire department and state building code <br />46 requirements for minimum width and surface conditions for means of access, means of <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.