Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-14-2012 - Agenda
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 02-14-2012 - Work Session
>
Agenda - 02-14-2012 - Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2015 11:51:27 AM
Creation date
2/13/2012 9:20:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/14/2012
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-14-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 2 <br />Shared Benefits <br />Examining Light Rail Transit Investments Near the Durham-Orange County Line <br />May 10, 2011 <br />Goal <br />Provide elected officials with objective information about Light Rail Transit (LRT) investment <br />benefits and costs to inform discussions on how to pay for both bus and rail investments with <br />any locally-controlled sales tax and vehicle fee revenues. <br />Settin <br />The planned Light Rail Transit investment would closely parallel the Durham-Orange County line <br />as it approaches Chapel Hill's Gateway station from the east near I-40 and US 15-501 until it <br />heads west-ward toward UNC-Chapel Hill from the Friday Center station along NC54. Half-mile <br />"walk access zones" at the Gateway Station, Meadowmont or Hillmont Stations (which lie along <br />alternative alignments) and the Friday Center would all be partly in both counties. <br />Discussion Framework <br />A Light Rail Transit (LRT) or Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) investment along the 17-mile corridor in the <br />Triangle Transit Alternatives Analysis would provide benefits to citizens and enterprises in both <br />Durham and Orange Counties, especially since the most intense and transit-supportive activities <br />are located at both ends of the line: UNC-Chapel Hill on the west and Downtown Durham and <br />Duke University on the east. These benefits are expected to overlap most significantly in the <br />"area of greatest mutual benefit" along the Durham-Orange County line described above. <br />Discussions among decision-makers about the investments have centered around three <br />elements: the different types of new revenues that might be available and their sources by <br />location; the costs of the investment, and how these costs relate to the amount of bus service <br />that could be provided in each county, and the benefits of the investments, and the degree to <br />which these benefits can be attributed to citizens and enterprises in each county. <br />New Revenues <br />Revenues for an LRT or BRT investment could come from several new revenue sources (in <br />addition to the existing Triangle Transit rental car tax, which will also supply funding): <br />1. Federal "new starts" $: 45 or 50%federal share assumed; federal $ required in finance model <br />2. State "intermodal bill" $: 25% state share assumed; state $ required in finance model <br />3. Local %: cent sales tax: included in finance model <br />4. Local $7 vehicle fee increase: included in finance model <br />5. Triangle Transit $3 increase in vehicle fee: included in finance model <br />6. Local government value capture: potential source; not currently in finance model <br />7. Institutional contributions: potential source; not currently in finance model <br />8. Parking deck or lot charges: potential source; not currently in finance model <br />9. Rider fares: included in finance model <br />Page I 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.