Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-21-2011 - C5
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 11-21-2011 - Quarterly Public Hearing - Late
>
Agenda - 11-21-2011 - C5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2012 9:37:48 AM
Creation date
2/9/2012 4:46:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/21/2011
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C.5
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-21-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
330 <br />Article 4: Overlay Zoning Districts <br />Section 42 Watershed Protection <br />4.2.5 Impervious Surface and Detention Pond Requirements for Residential Uses <br />69 Impervious Surface Ratio requirements in Section 6.3.7 are suggested to be relocated to this Section of the UDO <br />where other impervious surface regulations are located. Staff is suggesting that the higher impervious surface limits <br />apply only to higher - density residential because, at this time, single- family residential is potentially allowed in the <br />Buckhorn EDD (located in the Upper Eno PW); however, staff does not believe that 70% impervious surface is <br />desirable for lower density residential uses. Additionally, limiting residential uses in the Buckhom EDD to only <br />higher density residential on a limited basis is an anticipated work item in 2012. <br />70 Impervious Surface Ratio requirements in Section 6.3.7 are suggested to be relocated to this Section of the UDO <br />where other impervious surface regulations are located. Staff is suggesting that the higher impervious surface limits <br />apply only to higher - density residential because, at this time, single- family residential is potentially allowed in the <br />Eno EDD (located in the Lower Eno PW); however, staff does not believe that 70% impervious surface is desirable <br />for lower density residential uses. Additionally, limiting residential uses in the Eno EDD to only higher density <br />residential on a limited basis is an anticipated work item in 2012. <br />orange county, North Carolina — Unified Development Ordinance Page 4 -6 <br />IMPERVIOUS • • . REQUIREMENTS (RESIDENTIAL) <br />DISTRICT <br />IMPERVIOUS . • POND REQUIREMENTS <br />6% impervious surface limit. <br />UNIV -CA <br />EXCEPT for all lots which existed prior to 4/2/90, which are subject to impervious surface <br />UNIV -PW <br />limits as provided in the following Table (entitled Sliding Scale for Residential Impervious <br />Surface Ratios — Univ, Cane, and Little). <br />[11 BMPs cannot be used to satisfy watershed impervious surface requirements. <br />6% impervious surface limit. <br />CANE -CA <br />EXCEPT for lots smaller than two acres which existed prior to 1/1/94, which are subject to <br />CANE -PW <br />impervious surface limits as provided in the following Table (entitled Sliding Scale for <br />Residential Impervious Surface Ratios — Univ, Cane, and Little). <br />* BMPs cannot be used to satisfy watershed impervious surface requirements. <br />6% impervious surface limit. <br />EXCEPT for lots smaller than five acres which existed prior to 6/1/2010, which are subject to <br />U- ENO -CA <br />impervious surface limits as provided in the following Table (entitled Sliding Scale for <br />Residential Impervious Surface Ratios — Upper Eno). <br />* BMPs cannot be used to satisfy watershed impervious surface requirements. <br />6% impervious surface limit. <br />EXCEPT for lots which existed prior to 1/1/94, which are subject to impervious surface limits <br />LITTLE -PW <br />as provided in the following Table (entitled Sliding Scale for Residential Impervious Surface <br />Ratios - Univ, Cane, and Little). <br />* BMPs cannot be used to satisfy watershed impervious surface requirements. <br />FLAT -PW <br />12% impervious surface limit for new and existing lots. <br />HYCO -PW <br />* BMPs cannot be used to satisfy watershed impervious surface requirements. <br />12% impervious surface limit for existing and new lots outside of Transition Areas as <br />designated in the Orange County Land Use Plan. <br />[1] BMPs cannot be used to satisfy watershed impervious surface requirements. <br />30% impervious surface limit for developments which exceed a density 1 du /acre within <br />U- ENO -PW <br />Transition Areas as designated in the Orange County Land Use Plan. Structural BMPs are <br />BACK -PW <br />required if impervious surface exceeds 12 %. <br />70% impervious surface limit for residential uses developed at "high intensity" densities (R- <br />5, R -8, and R -13) in an Economic Development District as designated in the Land Use <br />Element of the Comprehensive Plan (high- density option) with structural BMPs if ISR > <br />12 %.ss <br />24% impervious surface limit with curb and gutter. <br />36% impervious surface limit without curb and gutter. <br />[1] BMPs cannot be used to satisfy watershed impervious surface requirements. <br />70% impervious surface limit for residential uses developed at "high intensity" densities (R- <br />L- ENO -PW <br />5, R -8, and R -13) in an Economic Development District as designated in the Land Use <br />Element of the Comprehensive Plan (high- density option), with structural BMPs required <br />when impervious surface exceeds: <br />24% (w/ curb and gutter); or <br />36% w/o curb and utter .70 <br />HAW -PW <br />24% impervious surface limit. <br />69 Impervious Surface Ratio requirements in Section 6.3.7 are suggested to be relocated to this Section of the UDO <br />where other impervious surface regulations are located. Staff is suggesting that the higher impervious surface limits <br />apply only to higher - density residential because, at this time, single- family residential is potentially allowed in the <br />Buckhorn EDD (located in the Upper Eno PW); however, staff does not believe that 70% impervious surface is <br />desirable for lower density residential uses. Additionally, limiting residential uses in the Buckhom EDD to only <br />higher density residential on a limited basis is an anticipated work item in 2012. <br />70 Impervious Surface Ratio requirements in Section 6.3.7 are suggested to be relocated to this Section of the UDO <br />where other impervious surface regulations are located. Staff is suggesting that the higher impervious surface limits <br />apply only to higher - density residential because, at this time, single- family residential is potentially allowed in the <br />Eno EDD (located in the Lower Eno PW); however, staff does not believe that 70% impervious surface is desirable <br />for lower density residential uses. Additionally, limiting residential uses in the Eno EDD to only higher density <br />residential on a limited basis is an anticipated work item in 2012. <br />orange county, North Carolina — Unified Development Ordinance Page 4 -6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.