Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
318 Article 3: Base Zoning Districts <br />Section 3.7: Economic Development Districts <br />Lot size, min., per use I No requirement [1] <br />(square feet) <br />- •. Buildings/ 25 <br />Structures <br />Front Setback from Vehicle Use <br />ROW, min. (feet) Areas, <br />Storage 10 <br />Areas, Si ns <br />The purpose of the Economic Development Eno Higher Intensity <br />(EDE -2) District is to provide locations for a range of light industrial , y <br />distribution, retail, office, and services uses in the designated Eno <br />Economic Development District.* eet c as <br />Si g ns.. <br />Buildings/ 25 [2] <br />Structures <br />Rear Setback, min. Vehicle Use <br />APPLICABILITY (feet) Areas, <br />Storage 10 [2] <br />Areas, Si ns <br />This district will usually be applied where the following conditionsDIIrveway�Setf ]elfrolnt� <br />exist: Pr�op]e lines�rnm�,; <br />�,, <br />1. Site is located within the designated Eno Economic Development Setbacks between <br />District. Buildings, min. (feet) 20 <br />2. Urban services, such as water and sewer mains, are highly a< ,, ' 4 <br />desirable, but not required if acceptable alternatives are available .r <br />Any proposed use having reasonable access to water or sewer Fleig�t;r iI (feet <br />systems shall be required to connect to the systems regardless of 'r <br />the availability of acceptable alternatives. <br />`'Floor Area Ratio, R NR [4] .65 <br />DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS NOTES: max. <br />[1] Evaluated as part of the Site Plan review process. NR CU 75 <br />[2] Required side and rear setbacks adjacent to residentially zoned Y , Ww � k <br />land shall be equal to the required side or rear setback of the Rv ' <br />adjacent residential district. <br />[3] Two feet of additional height shall be allowed for one foot Required Livability R -CU 45 <br />increase of the required front and side setbacks. Space Ratio, min. <br />[4] R = residential, NR = non - residential, CU = conditional use 47 GO** rid w <br />46 Staff is suggesting the height limit be increased. 60 feet is already the allowable height limit in some of the <br />Hillsborough EDD districts. <br />47 This is a necessary addition if the ratios are added as shown. <br />48 The ratios are suggested to be added because staff is suggesting that the ratios used to regulate development in the <br />EDDs be the same types of ratios used in the other zoning districts. See Footnote pertaining to Section 6.3.1(D) for <br />additional explanation. <br />orange %,ounry, norm t;arouna — Unified Development Ordinance Page 3 -50 <br />