Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
316 <br />42 Staff is suggesting the height limit be increased. 60 feet is already the allowable height limit in some of the <br />Hillsborough EDD districts. <br />4s This is a necessary addition if the ratios are added as shown. <br />44 The ratios are suggested to be added because staff is suggesting that the ratios used to regulate development hi the <br />EDDs be the same types of ratios used in the other zoning districts. See Footnote pertaining to Section 6.3.1(D) for <br />additional explanation. <br />vlanye %luunry, worEn uarouna — unified Development Ordinance <br />Page 3-48 <br />Article 3: Base Zoning Districts <br />Section 3.7: Economic Development Districts <br />Buildings/ <br />RIM rad'9711:41M. <br />Rear Setback, min. <br />Structures <br />Lot size, min., per <br />• • • • <br />use (square feet) No requirement [1] <br />APPLICABILITY <br />(feet) <br />Areas, Storage <br />t� <br />- - - • <br />Buildings/ 25 <br />Areas Signs <br />Front Setback from Structures <br />This district will usually be applied where the following conditionsDrivewaySetback <br />ROW, min. (feet) Vehicle Use <br />` Nil <br />Areas, Storage 10 <br />The purpose of the Economic Development Eno Lower Intensity: <br />(EDE -1) District is to provide locations for a range lower intensitySid <br />Areas, Si ns <br />#Builds <br />of <br />Setback; min t ctur s <br />non - residential uses in the designated Eno Economic Development <br />District. <br />t v ehicle Use <br />(feet) .. - <br />42 Staff is suggesting the height limit be increased. 60 feet is already the allowable height limit in some of the <br />Hillsborough EDD districts. <br />4s This is a necessary addition if the ratios are added as shown. <br />44 The ratios are suggested to be added because staff is suggesting that the ratios used to regulate development hi the <br />EDDs be the same types of ratios used in the other zoning districts. See Footnote pertaining to Section 6.3.1(D) for <br />additional explanation. <br />vlanye %luunry, worEn uarouna — unified Development Ordinance <br />Page 3-48 <br />Buildings/ <br />Rear Setback, min. <br />Structures <br />25 [2] <br />Vehicle Use <br />APPLICABILITY <br />(feet) <br />Areas, Storage <br />10 [2] <br />Areas Signs <br />This district will usually be applied where the following conditionsDrivewaySetback <br />` Nil <br />exist: <br />r <br />Mfr m §Popert�is,� <br />10 a° <br />zmii feetE ,, <br />1. Site is located within the designated Eno Economic Development <br />Setbacks between <br />District. <br />Buildings, min. <br />20 <br />feet <br />2. Urban services, such as water and sewer mains, are highly <br />desirable, but not required if acceptable alternatives are available. <br />Any proposed use having reasonable access to water or sewer <br />I height, max (feet)'a <br />; <br />systems shall be required to connect to the systems regardless of <br />*5, <br />the availability of acceptable alternatives. <br />44 Floor Area Ratio, <br />R NR [4] <br />.60 <br />max. <br />NR -CU <br />70 <br />DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS NOTES: <br />ttitreif <br />� <br />[1] Evaluated as part of the Site Plan review process. <br />Ro'`' <br />, <br />[2] Required side and rear setbacks adjacent to residentially zoned <br />'2.`4° <br />land shall be equal to the required side or rear setback of the <br />Required Livability <br />adjacent residential district. <br />Space Ratio, min. <br />R -CU <br />45 <br />[3] Two feet of additional height shall be allowed for one foot <br />Gpb4s Land <br />���r <br />increase of the required front and side setbacks. <br />as <br />[4] R = residential, NR = non - residential, CU = conditional use. <br />m,/max <br />t�qn <br />f .. <br />Required <br />Pedestrian/Landsc <br />NR R <br />05 <br />ape Ratio, min. <br />NR <br />42 Staff is suggesting the height limit be increased. 60 feet is already the allowable height limit in some of the <br />Hillsborough EDD districts. <br />4s This is a necessary addition if the ratios are added as shown. <br />44 The ratios are suggested to be added because staff is suggesting that the ratios used to regulate development hi the <br />EDDs be the same types of ratios used in the other zoning districts. See Footnote pertaining to Section 6.3.1(D) for <br />additional explanation. <br />vlanye %luunry, worEn uarouna — unified Development Ordinance <br />Page 3-48 <br />