Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-21-2011 - C5
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 11-21-2011 - Quarterly Public Hearing - Late
>
Agenda - 11-21-2011 - C5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2012 9:37:48 AM
Creation date
2/9/2012 4:46:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/21/2011
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C.5
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-21-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
282 <br />Article 2: Procedures <br />Section 2.5: Site Plan Review <br />(1) Erosion control and grading plans as necessary to be approved by the Erosion <br />Control Officer for a grading permit, and <br />(2) Building construction plans to be approved by the Building Official prior to <br />issuance of a building permit. <br />2.5.3 Plan Specifications <br />Each site plan shall be drawn at a scale adequate to show required detail and shall contain the <br />following information: <br />(A) The boundary of the lot(s) to be developed labeled with bearings and distances; <br />(B) The name, address, and phone number of the applicant and the property owner; <br />(C) Name of project, vicinity map, north arrow, scale, tax map reference number, date of plan <br />preparation, and subsequent revision dates; <br />(D) Zoning of the property to be developed and all adjacent zoning and existing adjacent land <br />uses; <br />(E) Adjacent right -of -way widths with road names and numbers; <br />(F) A development summary including total acres, proposed use(s), total building square <br />footage, required and proposed parking spaces.' [Note that subsequent requirements (G <br />through V) have been automatically renumbered] <br />(G) Demonstrated compliance with all applicable performance standards contained in Articles <br />3, 4, 5, and 6 of this Ordinance; <br />(H) Maximum and proposed impervious surface and required stream buffers as detailed in <br />Sections 4.2 and 6.12 of this Ordinance; <br />(1) Estimated traffic generated by the proposed development in trips per day. If the estimate <br />exceeds 800 trips per day, a traffic impact study must be submitted in accordance with <br />Section 6.17; <br />(J) Front, side, and rear building setbacks as required by Articles 3 and 5 of this Ordinance; <br />(K) Location of all proposed buildings and structures labeled with floor area, building height <br />and function, and proposed finished floor elevation; <br />(L) Vehicular use areas including existing and proposed streets and access drives, off street <br />parking and loading to comply with Section 6.9 of this Ordinance, and entry/exit points of <br />adjacent parcels; <br />(M) Overhead and underground utilities with accompanying easements and storm drainage <br />facilities /easements (including septic tanks and wastewater disposal fields, wells, fire <br />hydrants, irrigation, and security lights); <br />(N) Solid waste disposal facilities; <br />(0) All proposed free - standing and wall- mounted signs. Signs must comply with Section 6.12 <br />of this Ordinance; <br />(P) A landscape plan demonstrating compliance with Section 6.8 of this Ordinance; <br />(Q) For all developments other than single - family residential and duplexes, existing contour <br />lines (dashed) and proposed contours (solid) at 5 -foot intervals with 10 -foot contours <br />bold. Where site conditions warrant, 2 -foot contours may be required; <br />1 In an effort to streamline the UDO in areas related to economic development efforts, this requirement is suggested <br />to apply to all site plans since it is reasonable to require of all site plans and it is the only requirement in existing <br />Section 2.5.7 (A)(2) and 2.5.7(B)(2) that is not redundant with Section 2.5.3. Adding this reasonable requirement, <br />which the large majority of applicants already provide in order to show compliance with (G), to Section 2.5.3 Nvill <br />allow for deletion of the redundant sections. <br />Orange County, North Carolina — Unified Development Ordinance <br />Page 2 -10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.