Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-07-2012 - 8c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 02-07-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 02-07-2012 - 8c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2015 1:51:37 PM
Creation date
2/6/2012 8:51:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/7/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8c
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-07-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
RES-2012-020 Resolution to Approve the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) for the Durham Orange County Transit Corridor
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orange County staff believes investment and implementation can be faster, as <br />permanent and less speculative than LRT especially when LRT could take 15 years to <br />analyze and put into operation. <br />Capacity <br />LRT - High Performing <br />BRT -high High Performing <br />Operating Costs <br />LRT - > 2000-2500 Passengers per peak hour <br />LRT may have cost efficiencies <br />BRT -high < 2500 BRT is less <br />BRT Cost savings with 800 PAX/HR of approximately 20% <br />The Durham-Orange Corridor is projected to operate with BRT better operating efficiency <br />levels. <br />Environmental Air ~ Wetlands <br />LRT - Medium Performing depending on source of electric which is coal at this <br />time <br />BRT -high Medium Performing however most BRT new orders are hybrid electric <br />BRT can be routed to be less invasive to off corridor (right-of-way) environmental areas. <br />Summary <br />FTA 2009 publications (see link: http://www.nbrti.or~/cBRT.html) note and Orange County <br />staff agrees that a community should match the technology with the need based on land <br />use and the ability to financially build and maintain. BRT-High is such a system that is <br />complimentary to these precepts in the BRT ability to remain flexible to changing <br />conditions and locational needs including the exponential rate of green technologies. <br />Although Orange County and the municipalities are expected to grow in population and <br />jobs over the long term planning horizon (25± years), the estimates do not create high <br />intensity skyscraper urban environments because of the limitations with other natural <br />resources such as water and the costs of public services. (Attachment F) <br />Additional Supporting Maps - (Attachments G, H, I, J) <br />Resolution/Orange County StafF Recommendation - Attachment K is a draft resolution for <br />the DCHC MPO Technical Advisory Committee's consideration at its meeting tomorrow, <br />February 8, 2012. Orange County staff is recommending changes, as shown in red, "tracked <br />changes" format. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: This action, although not the approval of a financial plan or '/2 cent <br />referendum, begins a process outlining a potential financial commitment of local (Durham and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.