Orange County NC Website
i <br /> 35 <br /> WHEREAS, both alignment options C 1 and C2 are potentially compatible with the overall <br /> vision for the transit corridor; and <br /> WHEREAS, the ridership, costs, environmental impacts, community impacts, and impacts on <br /> nearby roadway traffic of alignment options C1 and C2 need to be further studied in the Scoping <br /> and Preliminary Engineering/Draft Environmental Impact Statement(PE/DEIS)phases before a <br /> final decision is made on which alignment should be advanced; and <br /> WHEREAS, alignment option D3 in the South Square station area would best promote transit- <br /> supportive economic development; and <br /> WHEREAS,the adoption of the Locally Preferred Alternative does not include a <br /> recommendation for the location of a Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility and the location <br /> of this facility will be further studied in the Scoping and PE/DEIS phases; and <br /> WHEREAS, the adoption of the Locally Preferred Alternative will be followed by further study <br /> of the alignment and station locations in the Scoping and PE/DEIS phases when a final decision <br /> is made on the remaining active options; and <br /> WHEREAS, the substantive issues identified in public comments on the Alternatives Analysis <br /> will be addressed in subsequent development steps such as Scoping and PE/DEIS-; and <br /> WHEREAS there is an onizoing 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan process to collect <br /> public input and technical information on transportation programs and projects to be <br /> implemented maintained and operated over the next twenty-eight years in the MPO's planning <br /> area, which can further inform the Locally Preferred Alternative as it proceeds through a <br /> Federal Transit Administration multi-year process. <br /> BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan <br /> Planning Organization Transportation Advisory Committee adopts light rail transit technology <br /> on the alignment recommended in the "Detailed Definition of Alternatives Technical Report" <br /> dated July 2011 with the modification that both the C 1 and C2 options be carried forward as <br /> equal partners for further study in the Meadowmont and Hillmont station areas as the Locally <br /> Preferred Alternative for the Durham-Orange County Corridor (as illustrated on the attached <br /> map), and that the DCHC MPO intends to to this r n n into the fet4,,.,,.ling use public <br /> input and technical information obtained during the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan to <br /> further inform this LPA,provided here on this,the 8t' day of February, 2012. <br /> Lydia E. Lavelle, TAC Chair <br /> Durham County,North Carolina <br /> I certify that Lydia E. Lavelle personally appeared before me this day acknowledging to me that <br /> she signed the forgoing document. <br /> Date: February 8, 2012 <br /> Frederick Brian Rhodes,Notary Public <br /> My commission expires: May 10, 2015 <br />