Orange County NC Website
1. The end points of the corridor <br />2. The approximate alignment within the study corridor <br />3. The technology of the fixed guideway meaning light rapid transit (LRT) or bus rapid <br />transit (BRT high or low) and/or in some cases commuter rail (e.g. between Durham and <br />Wake) <br />Staff comments are as follows regarding the 3 aspects which are linked by number to the <br />aspects: <br />1. End points <br />The suggested corridor is known as Durham-Orange Alternate 4 (D-O A4) which is a <br />17.4 mile length between UNC Hospitals and Alston Avenue which is east of Duke and <br />Durham downtown. The approximate cost is $1.4 billion or over $80 million a mile. The <br />other alternates are shown in Attachment B, all with mobility, socio-economic, land use <br />and financial rankings. Staff believes these end points of D-O A4 are appropriate <br />because of the strong employment anchor UNC hospital and university at the southern <br />terminus within Orange County. <br />Durham-Orange Alternate 6 is another corridor segment that ranked well. This corridor is <br />10 miles from Gateway (east of Blue Cross-Blue Shield) to Alston Avenue estimated at <br />$750 million dollars (9/24/10). However, this alternate does not enter Orange County. <br />2. Alignment <br />a. Orange County staff agrees that the alignment near the southern terminus of the <br />corridor near UNC should be UNC(D) station. The alignment would allow for future <br />LRT or BRT expansion to the west into Carrboro. Other alignments closer to UNC <br />hospital created more dead-end scenarios, (Attachment C) <br />b. Orange County staff notes that two alignment options near and east of the Friday <br />Center known as C-1 (through Meadowmont) and C-2 (along the south side of NC 54 <br />past future Hillmont) are both challenging alignments from environmental, cost and <br />traffic standpoints. C-1 has invoked strong community concerns, as well as DENR, in <br />regards to the traversing of Jordan Lake federal environmental lands. C-2 would be <br />preferable to move forward since it parallels NC 54 right-of-way. (Attachment D) <br />NC 54 is scheduled to be widened within this transit program planning horizon and <br />fixed guideway corridors or lanes should be part of design and highway investment. <br />The farther this NC 54 alignment can continue further to the east towards I-40 and <br />Durham County based redevelopment opportunities at Falconbridge Shopping <br />Center, the greater potential to reduce traffic on NC 54 by creating a travel mode shift <br />from car to LRT, if the corresponding park and ride (P&R) lots can be created. If the <br />appropriately sized P&R lots cannot be found in this corridor, then BRT is a better <br />alternative to pick up passengers in the I-40/751/Southpoint and/or NC 54/Woodcroft <br />park and ride areas with direct transport to UNC area via the protected and reserved <br />BRT fixed guideway or mixed where necessary corridor. <br />