Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
pp- <br /> Article 2: Procedures 15 <br /> Section 2.5: Site Plan Review <br /> !n\ ldentifirat'nn and looa}inn of all site im prnvements;nol. r-linrr h. i1r1'nn.� <br /> �. ,., .,. .... .....� .r .,..._,.....�..... ..._uca-m-g--rcrrm�rJ,� <br /> streets aiatnr anrt cei�re c storm A -yin^na f �i"tiny end ;;A �thnr <br /> vcrc� crr+e-v-eez-vrrerv�-roc v-vcvrrr r.w.c.+ion., ,- - ... -.. .f <br /> SigRif'GaRt site features <br /> The Inn��pd_.otin__r enrl_-.F"e GiG of all yar4- sethaGkS <br /> (�} Title north s^ �;^mess ef� :� caj-�°c<e?s er,;nee;;Rd/o; <br /> -- Gf prepaFatiGA of e <br /> 2.5.8 Additional Requirements for Economic Development Districts <br /> (A) <br /> V <br /> aGGGFdanGe with the PFGVisions of this SeGtioR and geutlwi 2.4. <br /> (B) Prior to submission of an application for site plan approval, applicants will be requiFed t^ <br /> shail5 meet with representatives of the Planning and Inspections, and Economic <br /> Development Departments to identify policies, procedures, regulations, and fees <br /> applicable to development proposals. <br /> (C) <br /> by the PlanRing and InspeGtiGRG De artmeRt Staff fGF GGFnpliaRGe with the stand <br /> (D) Any proposed subdivision in an Economic Development District shall follow the approval <br /> procedures as specified in Section 2.16. <br /> (E) In addition to the submittal requirements contained in this Section, a complete application <br /> shall also include: <br /> (1) Building elevation drawings for each proposed structure; and <br /> (2) A minimum of two drawings of sections through the site illustrating existing and <br /> proposed grades, as well as the relationship of different site features. <br /> Failure meet they or'teria for site plan apptoy-a- ti tc�rt 'n this Section to address( ) �a-rtcn-c-icr-r-arGCrn-r�cn ���za�rn�ccmrs-stir sys-agLRGY <br /> 69in4i4ept-s-sa4G44-d <br /> 'StRf£Irapq1+Ea -Sent' result iR <br /> the development Plans Will be <br /> ret,imed to4he appliGant With�n 'tten explapation of the reas q fprdepial n e <br /> e��e sea-eqirl#eF tkt . <br /> (G) AR--applic-ant-sf}ali-bave4he--opttiefa-G4evieiflg the dev]rl�eprt eft pis-w-een�p�l+y4mh♦-the <br /> 64te . rda des g^-rataFia.,°s aR a,.lteMatiVe tha appliG�aRt fly fef-a-t.:anE€ittafnal <br /> 3 Other than one requirement,this section is redundant with Section 2.5.3. The one requirement is suggested to be <br /> added to Section 2.5.3 and this subsection can then be deleted. [see related footnote in Section 2.5.3]. <br /> a This is not really an"additional"requirement because all projects must comply with these sections(e.g.,see <br /> Section 2.4.1(A). This is a remnant that remains from when the former EDD Design Manual was distributed as a <br /> separate document and the process was contained in that document. Economic Development(ED)Department staff <br /> asked Planning staff to evaluate the language in this subsection to ensure only truly additional requirements are <br /> listed here. <br /> 5 Suggested change to be in conformance with how language is used throughout the UDO. <br /> 6 Redundant with the zoning district charts in Article 3 which direct users to Article 6. Additionally,staff reviews <br /> applications for compliance with the entire UDO,not just Sections 6.3 and 6.4. Rationale for change is also related <br /> to Footnote for(A)above regarding the EDD Design Manual. <br /> This is redundant with the procedures set forth in Section 2.5.4 for all site plan reviews. Economic Development <br /> Department staff has a concern about the negative connotations underlying the language in(F)and requested that <br /> Planning staff review the language. Planning staff believes(F)can be deleted because it is not specific to projects in <br /> EDDs,but,rather,is the normal process for all projects. <br /> Orange County,North Carolina—Unified Development Ordinance Page 2-14 <br />