Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-07-2012 - 7d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 02-07-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 02-07-2012 - 7d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/11/2015 4:36:45 PM
Creation date
2/3/2012 2:41:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/7/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7c
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-07-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
RES-2012-018 Resolution Amending the 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
73 <br /> r <br /> Approved 1/4/12 <br /> 61 Larry Wright: These changes to make everything....when I came on this Board, we were looking at the drafts of the 2030 <br /> 62 Comprehensive Plan and they were ovenvhelming. Does this erode anything in our ordinance in any incremental measure <br /> 63 overall? <br /> 64 <br /> 65 Alan Campbell: You are asking as to the Comprehensive Plan, these are technical changes that are not making less stringent <br /> 66 development? <br /> 67 <br /> 68 Larry Wright: Is there any direction to change the profile of the Comprehensive Plan? <br /> 69 <br /> 70 Mark Marcopios: The problem that anyone would have with this is rooted in the concern that it is making it easier or harder to <br /> 71 comply with what they wanted. <br /> 72 <br /> 73 Shannon Berry: I do not believe this package of Comprehensive Text Amendments is intended to or will erode the substance or <br /> 74 meat of the document but to clean up inconsistencies which cause confusion and ultimately cause problems. <br /> 75 <br /> 76 Perdita Holtz: I have a question about changing Historic to Historical. My concem is that it is located in the Naturai and Cultural, <br /> 77 Element which is not an element that the Planning Board is the primary advisory board on and I would be loathe to say that we <br /> 78 can do it without consulting with the CfE,which was the primary advisory board. <br /> 79 ' <br /> 80 Johnny Randall: It is not word smithing because it is an actual.... <br /> 81 <br /> 82 Perdita Holtz: Some people would argue that it is not word smithing but some people would disagree. <br /> 83 <br /> 84 Johnny Randall: I was on the CfE when we went over these things and it was something that I brought up several times. This is <br /> 85 actually a common error. <br /> 86 <br /> 87 Craig Benedict We will fonvard it to them and see their comments. <br /> 88 <br /> 89 Judith Wegner: Could we say that grammatical errors are corrected. <br /> 90 <br /> 91 Johnny Randall: It is not really grammatical if you go to the National Heritage Program list of endangered plants and animals, <br /> 92 Historical is the category. <br /> 93 <br /> 94 Brian Crawford: We need to make the suggestion and forward that this is what the Planning Board is intending to do and does <br /> 95 anyone have any objection. <br />� 96 <br /> 97 MoTioN made by Judith Wegner to adopt the amendment. Seconded by Alan Campbell. <br /> 98 YorE:Unanimous <br /> 99 <br /> 100 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.