Agenda - 02-07-2012 - 7c - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 1/4/12 � 3 178 179 MorioN made by Mark Marcoplos to approve the amendments as written. Seconded by Alan Campbell 180 VoTE: Unanimous 181 182 183 AGENDA ITEM 9: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT MAP AMENDMENT: TO t112k2 2 f@COfillll@f1d2�lOf1 t0 the BOCC 184 on a govemment-ini6ated amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Map to change 1 SS the land use classification of approximately 47-acres near Efland and Brookhollow Road, 186 along the south side of McGowan Creek from Agricultural Residentiai to 10-Year Transition. This item 1 g� was heard at the November 21,2011 quarterly public hearing. 1 gg Presenter: Tom Altieri,Planner III 189 190 Tom Altieri: Reviewed abstract. 191 192 Larry Wright: On Attachment 2,on page 51,on McGowan Creek, it goes on either side, I don't understand why these lines were 193 drawn to cross McGowan Creek and what this has to do with stream buffers and development up to that creek. 194 195 Tom Altieri: These are property lines and a separate coverage that shows the streams. Streams are further and more 196 specifically identified through the development approval process. What you see is the approximate location of that stream. If a 197 development came through,we would have to send our own staff to formally identify and document where that stream is. This is 198 just a series of overlays,which are prepared at a different point in time,with different technology, and I this is just a discrepancy 199 between a stream layer and a parcel layer. 200 201 Buddy Hartley: Is the intention for the property to be south of the stream? 202 203 Tom Altieri: To follow the stream. 204 205 Buddy Hartley: There may be parts of it where the property goes across the streamline. 206 ' 207 Tom Altieri: There may be slivers. Any development would be required to follow the buffer requirements. I did mention at the 208 public hearing that there was a minor subdivision approved for this parcel. Three acres have been carved off for minor 209 subdivision. It had not been platted and that is why those lines are not reflected here. 210 211 Judith Wegner: Is there any comment from the residents? 212 213 Tom Altieri: There is not. Craig Benedict has been in conversation with Don Efland who is the property owner and he is 214 supportive of the amendment. No adjacent property owners have had any opinion. 215 216 MorioN made by Judith Wegner to approve the amendment. Seconded by Lisa Stuckey. 217 Vore: Unanimous 218 219 220 AGENDA ITEM 1 O: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENTS: TO R18k@ 2�2COmRlel7d8t1011 t0 tF12 BOCC Ott 9oVemm2flt- 221 ini6ated amendments to the te� of several sections of the Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of the 222 amendments is to correct many inconsistenaes in the names of several land use categoriesldassifications and 223 terms as they are used throughout the docum�t, as well as to revise references to ordinances now 224 incorporated in the adopted UDO. This item was heard at the November 21,2011 quarterly public hearing. 225 Presenter: Shannon Berry,Planner II 226 227 Shannon Berry: Reviewed abstract. 228 229 Mark Marcoplos: Why is this something we are involved in? 23 0 231 Shannon Berry: It is an official document and there are processes that are ouUined that kick you to the UDO about how you 232 would amend this document. 233 234 Brian Crawford: All in the effort of more disclosure to the public. 235 4